spring解决循环依赖为何要用三级缓存?

关注“苏三说技术”,回复:开发手册、时间管理 有惊喜。web

也许有些朋友对spring的循环依赖问题并不了解,让咱们先一块儿看看这个例子。spring

@Service
public class AService {

    private BService bService;

    public AService(BService bService) {
        this.bService = bService;
    }

    public void doA() {
        System.out.println("call doA");
    }
}
@Service
public class BService {

    private AService aService;

    public BService(AService aService) {
        this.aService = aService;
    }

    public void doB() {
        System.out.println("call doB");
    }
}
@RequestMapping("/test")
@RestController
public class TestController {

    @Autowired
    private AService aService;

    @RequestMapping("/doSameThing")
    public String doSameThing() {
        aService.doA();
        return "success";
    }
}
@SpringBootApplication
public class Application {

    /**
     * 程序入口
     * @param args 程序输入参数
     */
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new SpringApplicationBuilder(Application.class).web(WebApplicationType.SERVLET).run(args);
    }
}

咱们在运行Application类的main方法启动服务时,报了以下异常:缓存

Requested bean is currently in creation: Is there an unresolvable circular reference?

这里提示得很明显,出现了循环依赖。 app

什么是循环依赖? ide

循环依赖是实例a依赖于实例b,实例b又依赖于实例a。函数

或者实例a依赖于实例b,实例b依赖于实例c,实例c又依赖于实例a。ui

像这种多个实例之间的相互依赖关系构成一个环形,就是循环依赖。 this

为何会造成循环依赖?spa

上面的例子中AService实例化时会调用构造方法 public AService(BService bService),该构造方法依赖于BService的实例。此时BService尚未实例化,须要调用构造方法public BService(AService aService)才能完成实例化,该构造方法巧合又须要AService的实例做为参数。因为AService和BService都没有提早实例化,在实例化过程当中又相互依赖对方的实例做为参数,这样构成了一个死循环,因此最终都没法再实例化了。prototype

spring要如何解决循环依赖?

只须要将上面的例子稍微调整一下,不用构造函数注入,直接使用Autowired注入。

@Service
public class AService {

    @Autowired
    private BService bService;

    public AService() {
    }

    public void doA() {
        System.out.println("call doA");
    }
}
@Service
public class BService {

    @Autowired
    private AService aService;

    public BService() {
    }

    public void doB() {
        System.out.println("call doB");
    }
}

咱们看到能够正常启动了,说明循环依赖被本身解决了

spring为何能循环依赖?

调用applicationContext.getBean(xx)方法,最终会调到AbstractBeanFactory类的doGetBean方法。因为该方法很长,我把部分不相干的代码省略掉了。

protected <T> T doGetBean(final String name, @Nullable final Class<T> requiredType,
@Nullable final Object[] args, boolean typeCheckOnly) throws BeansException { final String beanName = transformedBeanName(name);    Object bean;

    Object sharedInstance = getSingleton(beanName);
    if (sharedInstance != null && args == null) {
       省略........
      bean = getObjectForBeanInstance(sharedInstance, name, beanName, null);
    } else {
       省略........

        if (mbd.isSingleton()) {
          sharedInstance = getSingleton(beanName, () -> {
            try {
              return createBean(beanName, mbd, args);
            }
            catch (BeansException ex) {
              destroySingleton(beanName);
              throw ex;
            }
          });
          bean = getObjectForBeanInstance(sharedInstance, name, beanName, mbd);
        }

        else if (mbd.isPrototype()) {
          // It's a prototype -> create a new instance.
          Object prototypeInstance = null;
          try {
            beforePrototypeCreation(beanName);
            prototypeInstance = createBean(beanName, mbd, args);
          }
          finally {
            afterPrototypeCreation(beanName);
          }
          bean = getObjectForBeanInstance(prototypeInstance, name, beanName, mbd);
        }
        else {
          String scopeName = mbd.getScope();
          final Scope scope = this.scopes.get(scopeName);
          if (scope == null) {
            throw new IllegalStateException("No Scope registered for scope name '" + scopeName + "'");
          }
          try {
            Object scopedInstance = scope.get(beanName, () -> {
              beforePrototypeCreation(beanName);
              try {
                return createBean(beanName, mbd, args);
              }
              finally {
                afterPrototypeCreation(beanName);
              }
            });
            bean = getObjectForBeanInstance(scopedInstance, name, beanName, mbd);
          }
          catch (IllegalStateException ex) {
            throw new BeanCreationException(beanName,
                "Scope '" + scopeName + "' is not active for the current thread; consider " +
                "defining a scoped proxy for this bean if you intend to refer to it from a singleton",
                ex);
          }
        }
      }
      catch (BeansException ex) {
        cleanupAfterBeanCreationFailure(beanName);
        throw ex;
      }
    }
    省略........
    return (T) bean;
  }

咱们能够看到,该方法一进来会调用getSingleton方法从缓存获取实例,若是获取不到。会判断做用域是否为:单例,多列 或者 都不是,不一样的做用域建立实例的规则不同。接下来,咱们重点看一下getSingleton方法。

public Object getSingleton(String beanName) {
    return getSingleton(beanName, true);
  }
protected Object getSingleton(String beanName, boolean allowEarlyReference) {
    Object singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName);
    if (singletonObject == null && isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)) {
      synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {
        singletonObject = this.earlySingletonObjects.get(beanName);
        if (singletonObject == null && allowEarlyReference) {
          ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory = this.singletonFactories.get(beanName);
          if (singletonFactory != null) {
            singletonObject = singletonFactory.getObject();
            this.earlySingletonObjects.put(beanName, singletonObject);
            this.singletonFactories.remove(beanName);
          }
        }
      }
    }
    return singletonObject;
  }

咱们发现有三个Map集合:

/** Cache of singleton objects: bean name --> bean instance */
  private final Map<String, Object> singletonObjects = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(256);

  /** Cache of singleton factories: bean name --> ObjectFactory */
  private final Map<String, ObjectFactory<?>> singletonFactories = new HashMap<>(16);

  /** Cache of early singleton objects: bean name --> bean instance */
  private final Map<String, Object> earlySingletonObjects = new HashMap<>(16);

singletonObjects对应一级缓存,earlySingletonObjects对应二级缓存,singletonFactories对应三级缓存。

上面getSingleton方法的逻辑是:

  1. 先从singletonObjects(一级缓存)中获取实例,若是能够获取到则直接返回singletonObject实例。
  2. 若是从singletonObjects(一级缓存)中获取不对实例,再从earlySingletonObjects(二级缓存)中获取实例,若是能够获取到则直接返回singletonObject实例。
  3. 若是从earlySingletonObjects(二级缓存)中获取不对实例,则从singletonFactories(三级缓存)中获取singletonFactory,若是获取到则调用getObject方法建立实例,把建立好的实例放到earlySingletonObjects(二级缓存)中,而且从singletonFactories(三级缓存)删除singletonFactory实例,而后返回singletonObject实例。
  4. 若是从singletonObjects、earlySingletonObjects和singletonFactories中都获取不到实例,则singletonObject对象为空。

获取实例须要调用applicationContext.getBean("xxx")方法,第一次调用getBean方法,代码走到getSingleton方法时返回的singletonObject对象是空的。而后接着往下执行,默认状况下bean的做用域是单例的,接下来咱们重点看看这段代码:

createBean方法会调用doCreateBean方法,该方法一样比较长,咱们把不相干的代码省略掉。

protected Object doCreateBean(final String beanName, final RootBeanDefinition mbd, final @Nullable Object[] args)
      throws BeanCreationException {

    BeanWrapper instanceWrapper = null;
    省略......
    
    if (instanceWrapper == null) {
      instanceWrapper = createBeanInstance(beanName, mbd, args);
    }
    final Object bean = instanceWrapper.getWrappedInstance();
    省略........

    boolean earlySingletonExposure = (mbd.isSingleton() && this.allowCircularReferences &&
        isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName));
    if (earlySingletonExposure) {
      addSingletonFactory(beanName, () -> getEarlyBeanReference(beanName, mbd, bean));
    }

    Object exposedObject = bean;
    try {
      populateBean(beanName, mbd, instanceWrapper);
      exposedObject = initializeBean(beanName, exposedObject, mbd);
    }
    catch (Throwable ex) {
      省略 .....
    }
    省略 .......
    return exposedObject;
  }

该方法的主要流程是:

  1. 建立bean实例
  2. 判断做用域是否为单例,容许循环依赖,而且当前bean正在建立,尚未建立完成。若是都知足条件,则调用addSingletonFactory将bean实例放入缓存中。
  3. 调用populateBean方法进行依赖注入
  4. 调用initializeBean方法完成对象初始化和AOP加强

咱们关注的重点能够先放到addSingletonFactory方法上。

protected void addSingletonFactory(String beanName, ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory) {
    Assert.notNull(singletonFactory, "Singleton factory must not be null");
    synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {
      if (!this.singletonObjects.containsKey(beanName)) {
        this.singletonFactories.put(beanName, singletonFactory);
        this.earlySingletonObjects.remove(beanName);
        this.registeredSingletons.add(beanName);
      }
    }
  }

该方法的逻辑是判断若是singletonObjects(一级缓存)中找不到实例,则将singletonFactory实例放到singletonFactories(三级缓存)中,而且移除earlySingletonObjects(二级缓存)中的实例。

createBean方法执行完以后,会调用外层的getSingleton方法

咱们重点看看这个getSingleton方法

public Object getSingleton(String beanName, ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory) {
    Assert.notNull(beanName, "Bean name must not be null");
    synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {
      Object singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName);
      if (singletonObject == null) {
        if (this.singletonsCurrentlyInDestruction) {
          throw new BeanCreationNotAllowedException(beanName,
              "Singleton bean creation not allowed while singletons of this factory are in destruction " +
              "(Do not request a bean from a BeanFactory in a destroy method implementation!)");
        }
        beforeSingletonCreation(beanName);
        boolean newSingleton = false;
        boolean recordSuppressedExceptions = (this.suppressedExceptions == null);
        if (recordSuppressedExceptions) {
          this.suppressedExceptions = new LinkedHashSet<>();
        }
        try {
          singletonObject = singletonFactory.getObject();
          newSingleton = true;
        }
        catch (IllegalStateException ex) {

          singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName);
          if (singletonObject == null) {
            throw ex;
          }
        }
        catch (BeanCreationException ex) {
          if (recordSuppressedExceptions) {
            for (Exception suppressedException : this.suppressedExceptions) {
              ex.addRelatedCause(suppressedException);
            }
          }
          throw ex;
        }
        finally {
          if (recordSuppressedExceptions) {
            this.suppressedExceptions = null;
          }
          afterSingletonCreation(beanName);
        }
        if (newSingleton) {
          addSingleton(beanName, singletonObject);
        }
      }
      return singletonObject;
    }
  }

该方法逻辑很简单,就是先从singletonObjects(一级缓存)中获取实例,若是获取不到,则调用singletonFactory.getObject()方法建立一个实例,而后调用addSingleton方法放入singletonObjects缓存中。

protected void addSingleton(String beanName, Object singletonObject) {
    synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {
      this.singletonObjects.put(beanName, singletonObject);
      this.singletonFactories.remove(beanName);
      this.earlySingletonObjects.remove(beanName);
      this.registeredSingletons.add(beanName);
    }
  }

该方法会将实例放入singletonObjects(一级缓存),而且删除singletonFactories(二级缓存),这样之后再调用getBean时,都能从singletonObjects(一级缓存)中获取到实例了。

说了这么多,再回到示例中的场景。

spring为何要用三级缓存,而不是二级缓存?

像示例的这种状况只用二级缓存是没有问题的。

可是假若有这种状况:a实例同时依赖于b实例和c实例,b实例又依赖于a实例,c实例也依赖于a实例。

a实例化时,先提早暴露objectFactorya到三级缓存,调用getBean(b)依赖注入b实例。b实例化以后,提早暴露objectFactoryb到三级缓存,调用getBean(a)依赖注入a实例,因为提早暴露了objectFactorya,此时能够从三级缓存中获取到a实例, b实例完成了依赖注入,升级为一级缓存。a实例化再getBean(c)依赖注入c实例,c实例化以后,提早暴露objectFactoryc到三级缓存,调用getBean(a)依赖注入a实例,因为提早暴露了objectFactorya,此时能够从三级缓存中获取到a实例。注意这里又要从三级缓存中获取a实例,咱们知道三级缓存中的实例是经过调用singletonFactory.getObject()方法获取的,返回结果每次均可能不同。若是不用二级缓存,这里会有问题,两次获取的a实例不同。

总结:

    只有单例的状况下才能解决循环依赖问题,而且allowCircularReferences要设置成true。

如下状况仍是会出现循环依赖:

  1. 构造器注入
  2. 做用域非单例的状况,固然在自定义做用域,本身能够实现避免循环依赖的逻辑
  3. allowCircularReferences参数设置为false

你们喜欢这篇文章的话,烦请关注一下 :苏三说技术

相关文章
相关标签/搜索