func TestCounter(t *testing.T) {
counter := 0
for i := 0; i < 5000; i++ {
go func() {
counter++
}()
}
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
t.Logf("counter = %d", counter)
}
复制代码
输出shell
=== RUN TestCounter
--- PASS: TestCounter (1.00s)
share_mem_test.go:17: counter = 4616
PASS
Process finished with exit code 0
复制代码
结果代表,出现了屡次并发最终结果 错误 ,由于 counter 在多协程中是共享的,因此,会出现抢占资源,致使 counter 最终结果出现差别;并发
使用 Mutex性能
func TestCounterSafe(t *testing.T) {
var mut sync.Mutex
counter := 0
for i := 0; i < 5000; i++ {
go func() {
defer func() {
mut.Unlock()
}()
mut.Lock()
counter++
}()
}
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
t.Logf("counter = %d", counter)
}
复制代码
输出ui
=== RUN TestCounterSafe
--- PASS: TestCounterSafe (1.00s)
share_mem_test.go:33: counter = 5000
PASS
Process finished with exit code 0
复制代码
此次结果和预期是同样的,是由于咱们在协程中添加了 lock ,使用完成后给unlock掉;spa
func read(i int, m *sync.RWMutex, wg *sync.WaitGroup) {
println(i, "read start")
m.RLock()
println(i, "reading")
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
m.RUnlock()
println(i, "read over")
wg.Done()
}
func write(i int, m *sync.RWMutex, wg *sync.WaitGroup) {
println(i, "write start")
m.Lock()
println(i, "writing")
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
m.Unlock()
println(i, "write over")
wg.Done()
}
func TestRWMutex(t *testing.T) {
var m = new(sync.RWMutex)
var wg = new(sync.WaitGroup)
wg.Add(3)
// 写的时候啥也不能干
go write(1, m, wg)
go read(2, m, wg)
go write(3, m, wg)
wg.Wait()
}
复制代码
输出code
=== RUN TestRWMutex
1 write start
1 writing
2 read start
3 write start
1 write over
2 reading
2 read over
3 writing
3 write over
--- PASS: TestRWMutex (3.01s)
PASS
Process finished with exit code 0
复制代码
RWMutex 读锁是否是互斥的,可是写锁是互斥的,这样就提升了读的性能 能够尝试多加几个 Read 操做,就能很明显的看出,能够同时多个读,可是写的时候只能有一个写,而且不能读取;协程
func TestCounterWaitGroup(t *testing.T) {
var mut sync.Mutex
var wg sync.WaitGroup
counter := 0
for i := 0; i < 5000; i++ {
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer func() {
mut.Unlock()
}()
mut.Lock()
counter++
wg.Done()
}()
}
wg.Wait()
t.Logf("counter = %d", counter)
}
复制代码
输出资源
=== RUN TestCounterWaitGroup
--- PASS: TestCounterWaitGroup (0.00s)
share_mem_test.go:52: counter = 5000
PASS
Process finished with exit code 0
复制代码
方法string
以前代码里边使用的是time.Sleep() 去等待其余协程执行完成,若是这个时间过大会形成多余的等待,若是太短,就会致使程序在其余协程尚未结束的状况下结束;it
WaitGroup.Add() // 有一个协程就 add 1
WaitGrop.Done() // 协程里边结束一个就完成一个
WaitGrop.Wait() // 最外层等待全部的协程,直到最后一个结束