Write a SQL query to rank scores. If there is a tie between two scores, both should have the same ranking. Note that after a tie, the next ranking number should be the next consecutive integer value. In other words, there should be no "holes" between ranks.html
+----+-------+ | Id | Score | +----+-------+ | 1 | 3.50 | | 2 | 3.65 | | 3 | 4.00 | | 4 | 3.85 | | 5 | 4.00 | | 6 | 3.65 | +----+-------+
For example, given the above Scores
table, your query should generate the following report (order by highest score):post
+-------+------+ | Score | Rank | +-------+------+ | 4.00 | 1 | | 4.00 | 1 | | 3.85 | 2 | | 3.65 | 3 | | 3.65 | 3 | | 3.50 | 4 | +-------+------+
这道题给了咱们一个分数表,让咱们给分数排序,要求是相同的分数在相同的名次,下一个分数在相连的下一个名次,中间不能有空缺数字,这道题我是彻底照着史蒂芬大神的帖子来写的,膜拜大神中...大神总结了四种方法,那么咱们一个一个的来膜拜学习,首先看第一种解法,解题的思路是对于每个分数,找出表中有多少个大于或等于该分数的不一样的分数,而后按降序排列便可,参见代码以下:学习
解法一:url
SELECT Score, (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT Score) FROM Scores WHERE Score >= s.Score) Rank FROM Scores s ORDER BY Score DESC;
跟上面的解法思想相同,就是写法上略有不一样:spa
解法二:code
SELECT Score, (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT DISTINCT Score s FROM Scores) t WHERE s >= Score) Rank FROM Scores ORDER BY Score DESC;
下面这种解法使用了内交,Join是Inner Join的简写形式,本身和本身内交,条件是右表的分数大于等于左表,而后群组起来根据分数的降序排列,十分巧妙的解法:htm
解法三:blog
SELECT s.Score, COUNT(DISTINCT t.Score) Rank FROM Scores s JOIN Scores t ON s.Score <= t.Score GROUP BY s.Id ORDER BY s.Score DESC;
下面这种解法跟上面三种的画风就不太同样了,这里用了两个变量,变量使用时其前面须要加@,这里的:= 是赋值的意思,若是前面有Set关键字,则能够直接用=号来赋值,若是没有,则必需要使用:=来赋值,两个变量rank和pre,其中rank表示当前的排名,pre表示以前的分数,下面代码中的<>表示不等于,若是左右两边不相等,则返回true或1,若相等,则返回false或0。初始化rank为0,pre为-1,而后按降序排列分数,对于分数4来讲,pre赋为4,和以前的pre值-1不一样,因此rank要加1,那么分数4的rank就为1,下面一个分数仍是4,那么pre赋值为4和以前的4相同,因此rank要加0,因此这个分数4的rank也是1,以此类推就能够计算出全部分数的rank了。排序
解法四:leetcode
SELECT Score, @rank := @rank + (@pre <> (@pre := Score)) Rank FROM Scores, (SELECT @rank := 0, @pre := -1) INIT ORDER BY Score DESC;
参考资料:
https://leetcode.com/discuss/40116/simple-short-fast