CopyOnWriteArrayList简述

CopyOnWriteArrayList简单阅读源码

CopyOnWriteArrayList是Java并发包中提供的一个并发容器,它是个线程安全且读操做无锁的ArrayList,写操做则经过建立底层数组的新副原本实现,是一种读写分离的并发策略,咱们也能够称这种容器为"写时复制器",Java并发包中相似的容器还有CopyOnWriteSet。本文会对CopyOnWriteArrayList的实现原理及源码进行分析。数组

集合框架中的ArrayList是非线程安全的,Vector虽是线程安全的,但因为简单粗暴的锁同步机制,性能较差。而CopyOnWriteArrayList则提供了另外一种不一样的并发处理策略(固然是针对特定的并发场景)。安全

  不少时候,咱们的系统应对的都是读多写少的并发场景。CopyOnWriteArrayList容器容许并发读,读操做是无锁的,性能较高。至于写操做,好比向容器中添加一个元素,则首先将当前容器复制一份,而后在新副本上执行写操做,结束以后再将原容器的引用指向新容器。并发

 

优缺点分析

  了解了CopyOnWriteArrayList的实现原理,分析它的优缺点及使用场景就很容易了。app

  优势:框架

  读操做性能很高,由于无需任何同步措施,比较适用于读多写少的并发场景。Java的list在遍历时,若中途有别的线程对list容器进行修改,则会抛出ConcurrentModificationException异常。而CopyOnWriteArrayList因为其"读写分离"的思想,遍历和修改操做分别做用在不一样的list容器,因此在使用迭代器进行遍历时候,也就不会抛出ConcurrentModificationException异常了ide

  缺点:源码分析

  缺点也很明显,一是内存占用问题,毕竟每次执行写操做都要将原容器拷贝一份,数据量大时,对内存压力较大,可能会引发频繁GC;二是没法保证明时性,Vector对于读写操做均加锁同步,能够保证读和写的强一致性。而CopyOnWriteArrayList因为其实现策略的缘由,写和读分别做用在新老不一样容器上,在写操做执行过程当中,读不会阻塞但读取到的倒是老容器的数据。性能

源码分析:

/**
     * Appends the specified element to the end of this list.
     *
     * @param e element to be appended to this list
     * @return {@code true} (as specified by {@link Collection#add})
     */
    public boolean add(E e) {
        final ReentrantLock lock = this.lock;
        lock.lock();
        try {
            Object[] elements = getArray();
            int len = elements.length;
            Object[] newElements = Arrays.copyOf(elements, len + 1);
            newElements[len] = e;
            setArray(newElements);
            return true;
        } finally {
            lock.unlock();
        }
    }

/**
     * Removes the element at the specified position in this list.
     * Shifts any subsequent elements to the left (subtracts one from their
     * indices).  Returns the element that was removed from the list.
     *
     * @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {@inheritDoc}
     */
    public E remove(int index) {
        final ReentrantLock lock = this.lock;
        lock.lock();
        try {
            Object[] elements = getArray();
            int len = elements.length;
            E oldValue = get(elements, index);
            int numMoved = len - index - 1;
            if (numMoved == 0)
                setArray(Arrays.copyOf(elements, len - 1));
            else {
                Object[] newElements = new Object[len - 1];
                System.arraycopy(elements, 0, newElements, 0, index);
                System.arraycopy(elements, index + 1, newElements, index,
                                 numMoved);
                setArray(newElements);
            }
            return oldValue;
        } finally {
            lock.unlock();
        }
    }

CopyOnWrireArrayList vs Vector:

最重要的区别就是synchronizedthis

/**
 * Removes the first (lowest-indexed) occurrence of the argument
 * from this vector. If the object is found in this vector, each
 * component in the vector with an index greater or equal to the
 * object's index is shifted downward to have an index one smaller
 * than the value it had previously.
 *
 * <p>This method is identical in functionality to the
 * {@link #remove(Object)} method (which is part of the
 * {@link List} interface).
 *
 * @param   obj   the component to be removed
 * @return  {@code true} if the argument was a component of this
 *          vector; {@code false} otherwise.
 */
public synchronized boolean removeElement(Object obj) {
    modCount++;
    int i = indexOf(obj);
    if (i >= 0) {
        removeElementAt(i);
        return true;
    }
    return false;
}
相关文章
相关标签/搜索