http://www.cnblogs.com/luxiaoxun/archive/2013/05/09/3069036.htmljavascript
Dynamic Time Warping(DTW)是一种衡量两个时间序列之间的类似度的方法,主要应用在语音识别领域来识别两段语音是否表示同一个单词。php
1. DTW方法原理html
在时间序列中,须要比较类似性的两段时间序列的长度可能并不相等,在语音识别领域表现为不一样人的语速不一样。并且同一个单词内的不一样音素的发音速度也不一样,好比有的人会把“A”这个音拖得很长,或者把“i”发的很短。另外,不一样时间序列可能仅仅存在时间轴上的位移,亦即在还原位移的状况下,两个时间序列是一致的。在这些复杂状况下,使用传统的欧几里得距离没法有效地求的两个时间序列之间的距离(或者类似性)。java
DTW经过把时间序列进行延伸和缩短,来计算两个时间序列性之间的类似性:python
如上图所示,上下两条实线表明两个时间序列,时间序列之间的虚线表明两个时间序列之间的类似的点。DTW使用全部这些类似点之间的距离的和,称之为归整路径距离(Warp Path Distance)来衡量两个时间序列之间的类似性。git
2. DTW计算方法:github
令要计算类似度的两个时间序列为X和Y,长度分别为|X|和|Y|。算法
归整路径(Warp Path)spring
归整路径的形式为W=w1,w2,...,wK,其中Max(|X|,|Y|)<=K<=|X|+|Y|。windows
wk的形式为(i,j),其中i表示的是X中的i坐标,j表示的是Y中的j坐标。
归整路径W必须从w1=(1,1)开始,到wK=(|X|,|Y|)结尾,以保证X和Y中的每一个坐标都在W中出现。
另外,W中w(i,j)的i和j必须是单调增长的,以保证图1中的虚线不会相交,所谓单调增长是指:
最后要获得的归整路径是距离最短的一个归整路径:
最后求得的归整路径距离为D(|X|,|Y|),使用动态规划来进行求解:
上图为代价矩阵(Cost Matrix) D,D(i,j)表示长度为i和j的两个时间序列之间的归整路径距离。
3. DTW实现:
matlab代码:
function dist = dtw(t,r) n = size(t,1); m = size(r,1); % 帧匹配距离矩阵 d = zeros(n,m); for i = 1:n for j = 1:m d(i,j) = sum((t(i,:)-r(j,:)).^2); end end % 累积距离矩阵 D = ones(n,m) * realmax; D(1,1) = d(1,1); % 动态规划 for i = 2:n for j = 1:m D1 = D(i-1,j); if j>1 D2 = D(i-1,j-1); else D2 = realmax; end if j>2 D3 = D(i-1,j-2); else D3 = realmax; end D(i,j) = d(i,j) + min([D1,D2,D3]); end end dist = D(n,m);
C++实现:
dtwrecoge.h
dtwrecoge.cpp
C++代码下载:DTW算法.rar
http://blog.csdn.net/vanezuo/article/details/5586727
In time series analysis, dynamic time warping (DTW) is an algorithm for measuring similarity between two temporal sequences which may vary in time or speed. For instance, similarities in walking patterns could be detected using DTW, even if one person was walking faster than the other, or if there were accelerations and decelerations during the course of an observation. DTW has been applied to temporal sequences of video, audio, and graphics data — indeed, any data which can be turned into a linear sequence can be analyzed with DTW. A well known application has been automaticspeech recognition, to cope with different speaking speeds. Other applications include speaker recognition and onlinesignature recognition. Also it is seen that it can be used in partial shape matching application.
In general, DTW is a method that calculates an optimal match between two given sequences (e.g. time series) with certain restrictions. The sequences are "warped" non-linearly in the time dimension to determine a measure of their similarity independent of certain non-linear variations in the time dimension. This sequence alignment method is often used in time series classification. Although DTW measures a distance-like quantity between two given sequences, it doesn't guarantee the triangle inequality to hold.
This example illustrates the implementation of the dynamic time warping algorithm when the two sequences s
and t
are strings of discrete symbols. For two symbols x
and y
, d(x, y)
is a distance between the symbols, e.g. d(x, y)
= | x - y |
int DTWDistance(s: array [1..n], t: array [1..m]) { DTW := array [0..n, 0..m] for i := 1 to n DTW[i, 0] := infinity for i := 1 to m DTW[0, i] := infinity DTW[0, 0] := 0 for i := 1 to n for j := 1 to m cost:= d(s[i], t[j]) DTW[i, j] := cost + minimum(DTW[i-1, j ], // insertion DTW[i , j-1], // deletion DTW[i-1, j-1]) // match return DTW[n, m] }
We sometimes want to add a locality constraint. That is, we require that if s[i]
is matched with t[j]
, then | i - j |
is no larger than w
, a window parameter.
We can easily modify the above algorithm to add a locality constraint (differences marked in bold italic
). However, the above given modification works only if | n - m |
is no larger than w
, i.e. the end point is within the window length from diagonal. In order to make the algorithm work, the window parameter w
must be adapted so that | n - m | ≤ w
(see the line marked with (*) in the code).
int DTWDistance(s: array [1..n], t: array [1..m], w: int) { DTW := array [0..n, 0..m] w := max(w, abs(n-m)) // adapt window size (*) for i := 0 to n for j:= 0 to m DTW[i, j] := infinity DTW[0, 0] := 0 for i := 1 to n for j := max(1, i-w) to min(m, i+w) cost := d(s[i], t[j]) DTW[i, j] := cost + minimum(DTW[i-1, j ], // insertion DTW[i, j-1], // deletion DTW[i-1, j-1]) // match return DTW[n, m]
Computing the DTW requires in general. Fast techniques for computing DTW include SparseDTW[1] and the FastDTW.[2] A common task, retrieval of similar time series, can be accelerated by using lower bounds such as LB_Keogh[3] or LB_Improved.[4] In a survey, Wang et al. reported slightly better results with the LB_Improved lower bound than the LB_Keogh bound, and found that other techniques were inefficient.[5]
Averaging for Dynamic Time Warping is the problem of finding an average sequence for a set of sequences. The average sequence is the sequence that minimizes the sum of the squares to the set of objects. NLAAF[6] is the exact method for two sequences. For more than two sequences, the problem is related to the one of the Multiple alignment and requires heuristics. DBA[7] is currently the reference method to average a set of sequences consistently with DTW. COMASA[8] efficiently randomizes the search for the average sequence, using DBA as a local optimization process.
A Nearest Neighbour Classifier can achieve state-of-the-art performance when using Dynamic Time Warping as a distance measure.[9]
An alternative technique for DTW is based on functional data analysis, in which the time series are regarded as discretizations of smooth (differentiable) functions of time and therefore continuous mathematics is applied.[10] Optimal nonlinear time warping functions are computed by minimizing a measure of distance of the set of functions to their warped average. Roughness penalty terms for the warping functions may be added, e.g., by constraining the size of their curvature. The resultant warping functions are smooth, which facilitates further processing. This approach has been successfully applied to analyze patterns and variability of speech movements.[11][12]
Due to different speaking rates, a non-linear fluctuation occurs in speech pattern versus time axis which needs to be eliminated.[13] DP-matching, which is a pattern matching algorithm discussed in paper "Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization For Spoken Word Recognition" by Hiroaki Sakoe and Seibi Chiba, uses a time normalisation effect where the fluctuations in the time axis are modeled using a non-linear time-warping function. Considering any two speech patterns, we can get rid off their timing differences by warping the time axis of one so that the maximum coincidence in attained with the other. Moreover, if the warping function is allowed to take any possible value, very less distinction can be made between words belonging to different categories. So, to enhance the distinction between words belonging to different categories, restrictions were imposed on the warping function slope.