Spring IOC容器 源码解析系列,建议你们按顺序阅读,欢迎讨论java
(spring源码均为4.1.6.RELEASE版本)spring
不知道你们有没有想过这样一种状况,在Spring的配置中,存在两个bean A和bean B,A依赖于B,B依赖于A,即A和B相互依赖(引用),xml配置以下:缓存
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd"> <bean id="beanA" class="com.lntea.spring.demo.bean.BeanA"> <property name="beanB" ref="beanB"></property> </bean> <bean id="beanB" class="com.lntea.spring.demo.bean.BeanB"> <property name="beanA" ref="beanA"></property> </bean> </beans>
BeanA.java并发
package com.lntea.spring.demo.bean; public class BeanA { private BeanB beanB; public void print(){ System.out.println("beanB:" + beanB + " beanA:" + beanB.getBeanA()); } public BeanB getBeanB() { return beanB; } public void setBeanB(BeanB beanB) { this.beanB = beanB; } }
BeanB.javaide
package com.lntea.spring.demo.bean; public class BeanB { private BeanA beanA; public BeanA getBeanA() { return beanA; } public void setBeanA(BeanA beanA) { this.beanA = beanA; } }
此时经过BeanFactory获取beanA,并调用print方法this
BeanA beanA = beanFactory.getBean("beanA",BeanA.class); beanA.print();
输出结果为spa
beanB:com.lntea.spring.demo.bean.BeanB@59a6e353 beanA:com.lntea.spring.demo.bean.BeanA@7a0ac6e3
能够看出beanA拿到了beanB的引用,beanB同时也拿到了beanA的引用。可见在Spring中是支持循环引用的,怎么实现的,有没有限制,咱们再从源码来解析一下。.net
getBean方法首先会从缓存中查询是否存在建立好的单例debug
Object sharedInstance = getSingleton(beanName); public Object getSingleton(String beanName) { return getSingleton(beanName, true); } protected Object getSingleton(String beanName, boolean allowEarlyReference) { // 查询缓存中是否有建立好的单例 Object singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName); // 若是缓存不存在,判断是否正在建立中 if (singletonObject == null && isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)) { // 加锁防止并发 synchronized (this.singletonObjects) { // 从earlySingletonObjects中查询是否有early缓存 singletonObject = this.earlySingletonObjects.get(beanName); // early缓存也不存在,且容许early引用 if (singletonObject == null && allowEarlyReference) { // 从单例工厂Map里查询beanName ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory = this.singletonFactories.get(beanName); if (singletonFactory != null) { // singletonFactory存在,则调用getObject方法拿到单例对象 singletonObject = singletonFactory.getObject(); // 将单例对象添加到early缓存中 this.earlySingletonObjects.put(beanName, singletonObject); // 移除单例工厂中对应的singletonFactory this.singletonFactories.remove(beanName); } } } } return (singletonObject != NULL_OBJECT ? singletonObject : null); }
从以上的代码能够看出code
上面最重要的就是singletonFactories什么时候放入了能够经过getObject得到bean对象的ObjectFactory。根据咱们的猜想,应该会是bean对象实例化后,而属性注入以前。仔细寻找后发现,在AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory类的doCreateBean方法,也就是实际bean建立的方法中,执行完createBeanInstance实例化bean以后有一段代码:
// bean为单例且容许循环引用且正在建立中 boolean earlySingletonExposure = (mbd.isSingleton() && this.allowCircularReferences && isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)); if (earlySingletonExposure) { if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) { logger.debug("Eagerly caching bean '" + beanName + "' to allow for resolving potential circular references"); } // 建立ObjectFactory并添加到singletonFactories中 addSingletonFactory(beanName, new ObjectFactory<Object>() { [@Override](https://my.oschina.net/u/1162528) public Object getObject() throws BeansException { return getEarlyBeanReference(beanName, mbd, bean); } }); } protected void addSingletonFactory(String beanName, ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory) { Assert.notNull(singletonFactory, "Singleton factory must not be null"); synchronized (this.singletonObjects) { // 判断默认缓存中没有beanName if (!this.singletonObjects.containsKey(beanName)) { // 添加ObjectFactory到singletonFactories this.singletonFactories.put(beanName, singletonFactory); this.earlySingletonObjects.remove(beanName); this.registeredSingletons.add(beanName); } } }
当判断bean为单例且正在建立中,而Spring容许循环引用时,将能得到bean对象的引用的ObjectFactory添加到singletonFactories中,此时就与以前的getSingleton方法相呼应。而allowCircularReferences标识在spring中默认为true,可是也能够经过setAllowCircularReferences方法对AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory进行设置。
再来看下getObject方法中的getEarlyBeanReference方法。这里也设置了一个InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor后置处理器的扩展点,容许在对象返回以前修改甚至替换bean。
protected Object getEarlyBeanReference(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, Object bean) { Object exposedObject = bean; if (bean != null && !mbd.isSynthetic() && hasInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessors()) { for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) { if (bp instanceof SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) { SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor ibp = (SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) bp; exposedObject = ibp.getEarlyBeanReference(exposedObject, beanName); if (exposedObject == null) { return exposedObject; } } } } return exposedObject; }
来梳理一下上面getBean("beanA")
的执行过程
上面咱们了解了单例的bean循环引用的处理过程,那么多例的呢?其实咱们能够按上面的思路来思考一下,单例bean的循环引用是由于每一个对象都是固定的,只是提早暴露对象的引用,最终这个引用对应的对象是建立完成的。可是多例的状况下,每次getBean都会建立一个新的对象,那么应该引用哪个对象呢,这自己就已是矛盾的了。于是spring中对于多例之间相互引用是会提示错误的。
// 若是已经存在多例的对象在建立中,就会抛出异常 if (isPrototypeCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)) { throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(beanName); }
Error creating bean with name 'beanA': Requested bean is currently in creation: Is there an unresolvable circular reference?
可见spring会认为多例之间的循环引用是没法解决的。