项目中有一个逻辑是这样的: 对当前元素的外层<li>元素进行操做, 个人作法是这样的:$(someElement.parents('li')).xxxjavascript
因为当前元素外层只有一个li元素,当时就没有多想,后来仔细查看parents(selector)方法的说明,发现调用这个方法以后会返回全部匹配selector的元素;html
按理说,返回值应该是一个数组或者相似数组的结构猜对,而在这种结构上调用单个元素的方法(好比attr('id'))感受上应该报错才对;java
而后作了以下实验:jquery
<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <style> b, span, p, html body { padding: .5em; border: 1px solid; } b { color:blue; } strong { color:red; } </style> <script type="text/javascript" src="/jquery/jquery.js"></script> </head> <body> <div id="div1"> <p> <div id='div2'> <span> <b>个人父元素是:</b> </span> </div> </p> </div> <script> var parentEls = $("b").parents('div'); var names = ''; names = $(parentEls).attr('id'); $("b").append("<strong>" + names+ "</strong>"); console.info($(parentEls)); </script> </body> </html>
发如今element.parents(selector)的返回值上调用attr('id')时,jquery默认是在第0个祖先上调用此方法,,即全部祖先中最接近element的那个祖先,以下图:数组
一开始查看parents(selector)的实现源码,没怎么看懂,今天看了一下attr(xxx)的源码,app
jQuery.fn.extend({ attr: function( name, value ) { return access( this, jQuery.attr, name, value, arguments.length > 1 ); }, removeAttr: function( name ) { return this.each(function() { jQuery.removeAttr( this, name ); }); } });
而后找到了access.js:this
// Multifunctional method to get and set values of a collection // The value/s can optionally be executed if it's a function var access = jQuery.access = function( elems, fn, key, value, chainable, emptyGet, raw ) { var i = 0, len = elems.length, bulk = key == null; // Sets many values if ( jQuery.type( key ) === "object" ) { chainable = true; for ( i in key ) { access( elems, fn, i, key[i], true, emptyGet, raw ); } // Sets one value } else if ( value !== undefined ) { chainable = true; if ( !jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) { raw = true; } if ( bulk ) { // Bulk operations run against the entire set if ( raw ) { fn.call( elems, value ); fn = null; // ...except when executing function values } else { bulk = fn; fn = function( elem, key, value ) { return bulk.call( jQuery( elem ), value ); }; } } if ( fn ) { for ( ; i < len; i++ ) { fn( elems[i], key, raw ? value : value.call( elems[i], i, fn( elems[i], key ) ) ); } } } return chainable ? elems : // Gets bulk ? fn.call( elems ) : //好像缘由就在这里:elems[0] len ? fn( elems[0], key ) : emptyGet; };
大概就是在第0个元素上调用的方法,因此我在代码中那么写就歪打正着了,若是元素外层有不止一个匹配selector的祖先,而我要在第二个祖先上调用方法,这么写就会出错了;
spa