在这篇文章中,咱们来聊一下线程的生命周期。java
线程是操做系统中的一个概念,在Java中,它是实现并发程序的主要手段。编程
Java中的线程,本质上就是操做系统中的线程。多线程
操做系统中的线程有“生老病死”,专业说法就是生命周期,虽然不一样的开发语言对于操做系统的线程作了不一样的封装,可是对于线程生命周期来讲,基本上是大同小异的。并发
咱们在学习线程的生命周期时,只要能理解生命周期中各个节点的状态转换机制就能够了。socket
操做系统中的线程有5种状态,能够用下面的图进行描述,该图也被称为五态模型。
tcp
线程的五种状态描述以下:编程语言
Java中的线程生命周期,基于操做系统的线程生命周期进行了定制,它包括六种状态:工具
Java中的线程生命周期能够用下图来描述。
oop
和操做系统线程生命周期相比,Java中的线程生命周期主要有如下2个改动:学习
Java线程状态中的阻塞、无时限等待和有时限等待能够理解为线程致使休眠状态的三种缘由,咱们来看一下这些状态之间是怎么转换的。
在Java中,只有一种状况会出现这种状态转换:线程等待synchronized隐式锁。synchronized修饰的方法、代码块同一时刻只容许一个线程执行,其余线程只能等待,在这种状况下,等待的线程会从运行状态转换到阻塞状态,而当等待的线程得到synchronized锁后,状态会从阻塞状态转换为运行状态。
线程调用阻塞式API时,会切换到阻塞状态吗?
在操做系统层面,线程是会切换到休眠状态的,可是在JVM层面,Java线程的状态不会切换,也就说Java线程依然是运行状态。JVM不关心操做系统调度相关的状态。在JVM看来,等待CPU使用权和等待I/O没有区别,都是在等待某个资源,因此都属于可运行/运行状态。
咱们平时说的Java调用阻塞式API时,线程会被阻塞,咱们指的是操做系统线程状态,而不是Java线程状态,这一点须要分清楚。
如下三种状况会触发运行状态和无时限等待状态的切换。
有时限等待和无时限等待的主要区别,在于触发条件中添加了超时参数。
如下五种状况会触发运行状态和有时限等待状态的切换。
Java刚建立出来的Thread对象就是初始化状态,有两种能够建立线程的方法:
初始化状态的线程,并不会被操做系统调度,所以不会被执行。在调用线程对象的start()方法后,线程就会从初始化状态切换到运行状态。
线程在如下两种状况时会自动切换到终止状态:
咱们有2种方法终止线程:
咱们不推荐使用stop()方法,在JDK中,它已经被标记为Deprecated。咱们推荐使用interrupt()方法来终止线程。
stop()方法和interrupt()方法的区别:
被调用了interrupt()方法的线程,有如下2种方式接收通知:
在查看了Java线程生命周期中的状态以及状态之间的切换后,咱们来使用jstack来查看一下真实运行的线程的状态。
咱们以一个死锁的程序为例,来讲明如何使用jstack。
咱们在解释互斥锁和死锁的时候,写了一些死锁示例,代码以下。
public class BankTransferDemo { public void transfer(BankAccount sourceAccount, BankAccount targetAccount, double amount) { synchronized(sourceAccount) { synchronized(targetAccount) { if (sourceAccount.getBalance() > amount) { System.out.println("Start transfer."); System.out.println(String.format("Before transfer, source balance:%s, target balance:%s", sourceAccount.getBalance(), targetAccount.getBalance())); sourceAccount.setBalance(sourceAccount.getBalance() - amount); targetAccount.setBalance(targetAccount.getBalance() + amount); System.out.println(String.format("After transfer, source balance:%s, target balance:%s", sourceAccount.getBalance(), targetAccount.getBalance())); } } } } }
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException { BankAccount sourceAccount = new BankAccount(); sourceAccount.setId(1); sourceAccount.setBalance(50000); BankAccount targetAccount = new BankAccount(); targetAccount.setId(2); targetAccount.setBalance(20000); BankTransferDemo obj = new BankTransferDemo(); Thread t1 = new Thread(() ->{ for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { obj.transfer(sourceAccount, targetAccount, 1); } }); Thread t2 = new Thread(() ->{ for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { obj.transfer(targetAccount, sourceAccount, 1); } }); t1.start(); t2.start(); t1.join(); t2.join(); System.out.println("Finished."); }
上述代码在运行过程当中,由于资源争抢的缘由,最后会进入死锁状态,下面咱们来看一下如何使用jstack来获取具体信息。
(base) ➜ ~ jstack -l 63044
请注意上述的63044
是运行的pid,运行程序屡次产生的pid是不同的。
jstack的返回结果以下。
2021-01-15 19:56:28 Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (25.251-b08 mixed mode): "RMI TCP Accept-0" #14 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d80b6000 nid=0x5803 runnable [0x00007000059d8000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.accept(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:409) at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:545) at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:513) at sun.management.jmxremote.LocalRMIServerSocketFactory$1.accept(LocalRMIServerSocketFactory.java:52) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.executeAcceptLoop(TCPTransport.java:405) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.run(TCPTransport.java:377) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Attach Listener" #12 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db03d800 nid=0x3617 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Thread-1" #11 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db04e800 nid=0xa603 waiting for monitor entry [0x00007000057d2000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$1(BankTransferDemo.java:38) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$2/1044036744.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Thread-0" #10 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d896e000 nid=0xa703 waiting for monitor entry [0x00007000056cf000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$0(BankTransferDemo.java:32) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$1/135721597.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Service Thread" #9 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1de809000 nid=0x5503 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C1 CompilerThread3" #8 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1df80a800 nid=0x3b03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread2" #7 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1df80a000 nid=0x3a03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread1" #6 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1df809000 nid=0x3e03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread0" #5 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1df008800 nid=0x3803 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Signal Dispatcher" #4 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1de808800 nid=0x4103 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Finalizer" #3 daemon prio=8 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d8810800 nid=0x3203 in Object.wait() [0x0000700004db1000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x000000076ab08ee0> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:144) - locked <0x000000076ab08ee0> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:165) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:216) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Reference Handler" #2 daemon prio=10 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d900b000 nid=0x3103 in Object.wait() [0x0000700004cae000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x000000076ab06c00> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502) at java.lang.ref.Reference.tryHandlePending(Reference.java:191) - locked <0x000000076ab06c00> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:153) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "main" #1 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db809000 nid=0x1003 in Object.wait() [0x000070000408a000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x000000076ab770c0> (a java.lang.Thread) at java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1252) - locked <0x000000076ab770c0> (a java.lang.Thread) at java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1326) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.main(BankTransferDemo.java:45) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "VM Thread" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db821000 nid=0x4c03 runnable "GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db809800 nid=0x1f07 runnable "GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d8008800 nid=0x1b03 runnable "GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db009000 nid=0x1d03 runnable "GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db009800 nid=0x2a03 runnable "GC task thread#4 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db00a000 nid=0x2c03 runnable "GC task thread#5 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db00a800 nid=0x2d03 runnable "GC task thread#6 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db80a000 nid=0x5203 runnable "GC task thread#7 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db00b800 nid=0x5003 runnable "GC task thread#8 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db00c000 nid=0x4f03 runnable "GC task thread#9 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d900a800 nid=0x4d03 runnable "VM Periodic Task Thread" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d8028800 nid=0xa803 waiting on condition JNI global references: 333 Found one Java-level deadlock: ============================= "Thread-1": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb1db8270a8 (object 0x000000076ab76ef0, a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount), which is held by "Thread-0" "Thread-0": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb1db827158 (object 0x000000076ab76f10, a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount), which is held by "Thread-1" Java stack information for the threads listed above: =================================================== "Thread-1": at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$1(BankTransferDemo.java:38) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$2/1044036744.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) "Thread-0": at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$0(BankTransferDemo.java:32) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$1/135721597.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Found 1 deadlock.
咱们从中能够看到线程的状态有RUNNABLE,WAITING,BLOCKED,例如:
"Thread-0" #10 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d896e000 nid=0xa703 waiting for monitor entry [0x00007000056cf000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$0(BankTransferDemo.java:32) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$1/135721597.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None
下面是死锁的相关信息:
Found one Java-level deadlock: ============================= "Thread-1": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb1db8270a8 (object 0x000000076ab76ef0, a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount), which is held by "Thread-0" "Thread-0": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb1db827158 (object 0x000000076ab76f10, a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount), which is held by "Thread-1"
从上面的描述中,咱们能够清楚的看到2个线程在互相等待对方持有的锁对象。
jstack是一个很是实用的工具,我会在后面找机会详细的说明如何使用它和其余相关工具。