在前几篇中,介绍了Spring事务中核心的原理,如事务AOP代理TransactionProxyFactoryBean及事务管理器PlatformmTransactionManager,而最终以@Transactional注解这种非侵入式甚至近乎无感知的方式运行在咱们的大大小小的项目中,只须要在配置文件中加上简单的配置,所以也就称为声明式事务:事务与业务解耦。java
在spring配置文件中加上事务注解驱动,以及事务管理器spring
<!-- 事务注解驱动 --> <tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager"/> <!-- 事务管理器 --> <bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager"> <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"></property> </bean>
此时,在须要事务的方法上加上@Transactional便可(前提是类被spring容器管理)。要分析其运行的原理,得从事务注解驱动的配置开始。根据Spring解析xml Namespace的规则,直接查找TxNamespaceHandler,对annotation-driven的解析由AnnotationDrivenBeanDefinitionParser执行。缓存
public BeanDefinition parse(Element element, ParserContext parserContext) { registerTransactionalEventListenerFactory(parserContext); String mode = element.getAttribute("mode"); if ("aspectj".equals(mode)) { // mode="aspectj" registerTransactionAspect(element, parserContext); } else { // mode="proxy" AopAutoProxyConfigurer.configureAutoProxyCreator(element, parserContext); } return null; }
默认状况下,不用配置mode,即由其内部静态类AopAutoProxyConfigurer完成配置ide
public static void configureAutoProxyCreator(Element element, ParserContext parserContext) { // 配置AOP自动代理 AopNamespaceUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(parserContext, element); // 事务切面名称为org.springframework.transaction.config.internalTransactionAdvisor String txAdvisorBeanName = TransactionManagementConfigUtils.TRANSACTION_ADVISOR_BEAN_NAME; if (!parserContext.getRegistry().containsBeanDefinition(txAdvisorBeanName)) { Object eleSource = parserContext.extractSource(element); // Create the TransactionAttributeSource definition. // 定义事务属性源为AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource RootBeanDefinition sourceDef = new RootBeanDefinition( "org.springframework.transaction.annotation.AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource"); sourceDef.setSource(eleSource); sourceDef.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE); String sourceName = parserContext.getReaderContext().registerWithGeneratedName(sourceDef); // Create the TransactionInterceptor definition. // 定义事务拦截器 RootBeanDefinition interceptorDef = new RootBeanDefinition(TransactionInterceptor.class); interceptorDef.setSource(eleSource); interceptorDef.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE); registerTransactionManager(element, interceptorDef); interceptorDef.getPropertyValues().add("transactionAttributeSource", new RuntimeBeanReference(sourceName)); String interceptorName = parserContext.getReaderContext().registerWithGeneratedName(interceptorDef); // Create the TransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor definition. // 定义事务切面为BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor RootBeanDefinition advisorDef = new RootBeanDefinition(BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor.class); advisorDef.setSource(eleSource); advisorDef.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE); advisorDef.getPropertyValues().add("transactionAttributeSource", new RuntimeBeanReference(sourceName)); advisorDef.getPropertyValues().add("adviceBeanName", interceptorName); if (element.hasAttribute("order")) { advisorDef.getPropertyValues().add("order", element.getAttribute("order")); } parserContext.getRegistry().registerBeanDefinition(txAdvisorBeanName, advisorDef); CompositeComponentDefinition compositeDef = new CompositeComponentDefinition(element.getTagName(), eleSource); compositeDef.addNestedComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(sourceDef, sourceName)); compositeDef.addNestedComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(interceptorDef, interceptorName)); compositeDef.addNestedComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(advisorDef, txAdvisorBeanName)); parserContext.registerComponent(compositeDef); } }
主要配置的有三部分:ui
这里配置的事务属性源是AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource,支持根据类和方法获取事务属性。this
@Override @Nullable protected TransactionAttribute findTransactionAttribute(Method method) { return determineTransactionAttribute(method); } @Override @Nullable protected TransactionAttribute findTransactionAttribute(Class<?> clazz) { return determineTransactionAttribute(clazz); }
统一调用determineTransactionAttribute方法spa
protected TransactionAttribute determineTransactionAttribute(AnnotatedElement ae) { // 注解解析器解析事务注解 for (TransactionAnnotationParser annotationParser : this.annotationParsers) { TransactionAttribute attr = annotationParser.parseTransactionAnnotation(ae); if (attr != null) { return attr; } } return null; }
在AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource的构造方法中,初始化了注解解析器.net
public AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource(boolean publicMethodsOnly) { this.publicMethodsOnly = publicMethodsOnly; this.annotationParsers = new LinkedHashSet<>(2); // 支持Spring的@Transactional this.annotationParsers.add(new SpringTransactionAnnotationParser()); // 支持javax.transaction.Transactional if (jta12Present) { this.annotationParsers.add(new JtaTransactionAnnotationParser()); } // 支持javax.ejb.TransactionAttribute if (ejb3Present) { this.annotationParsers.add(new Ejb3TransactionAnnotationParser()); } }
SpringTransactionAnnotationParser中判断类和方法上是否有@Transactional,而后解析注解的属性scala
public TransactionAttribute parseTransactionAnnotation(AnnotatedElement ae) { // 判断类和方法上的@Transactional AnnotationAttributes attributes = AnnotatedElementUtils.findMergedAnnotationAttributes( ae, Transactional.class, false, false); if (attributes != null) { // 解析@Transactional return parseTransactionAnnotation(attributes); } else { return null; } }
建立事务属性对象RuleBasedTransactionAttribute,获取事务属性配置debug
protected TransactionAttribute parseTransactionAnnotation(AnnotationAttributes attributes) { RuleBasedTransactionAttribute rbta = new RuleBasedTransactionAttribute(); Propagation propagation = attributes.getEnum("propagation"); rbta.setPropagationBehavior(propagation.value()); Isolation isolation = attributes.getEnum("isolation"); rbta.setIsolationLevel(isolation.value()); rbta.setTimeout(attributes.getNumber("timeout").intValue()); rbta.setReadOnly(attributes.getBoolean("readOnly")); // value指定哪一个事务管理器 rbta.setQualifier(attributes.getString("value")); ArrayList<RollbackRuleAttribute> rollBackRules = new ArrayList<>(); Class<?>[] rbf = attributes.getClassArray("rollbackFor"); for (Class<?> rbRule : rbf) { RollbackRuleAttribute rule = new RollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule); rollBackRules.add(rule); } String[] rbfc = attributes.getStringArray("rollbackForClassName"); for (String rbRule : rbfc) { RollbackRuleAttribute rule = new RollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule); rollBackRules.add(rule); } Class<?>[] nrbf = attributes.getClassArray("noRollbackFor"); for (Class<?> rbRule : nrbf) { NoRollbackRuleAttribute rule = new NoRollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule); rollBackRules.add(rule); } String[] nrbfc = attributes.getStringArray("noRollbackForClassName"); for (String rbRule : nrbfc) { NoRollbackRuleAttribute rule = new NoRollbackRuleAttribute(rbRule); rollBackRules.add(rule); } rbta.getRollbackRules().addAll(rollBackRules); return rbta; }
@Transactional的value值定义的是由哪一个事务管理器管理,若是没有配置rollbackFor和noRollbackFor属性,由RuleBasedTransactionAttribute的父类DefaultTransactionAttribute默认定义异常回滚规则:遇到运行时异常和Error回滚事务。
public boolean rollbackOn(Throwable ex) { return (ex instanceof RuntimeException || ex instanceof Error); }
至此,事务属性的解析很清晰了,那么又是在何处调用事务属性源的findTransactionAttribute方法?
BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor继承自AbstractBeanFactoryPointcutAdvisor,重要的是定义了切点为TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut。
public class BeanFactoryTransactionAttributeSourceAdvisor extends AbstractBeanFactoryPointcutAdvisor { @Nullable private TransactionAttributeSource transactionAttributeSource; private final TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut pointcut = new TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut() { @Override @Nullable protected TransactionAttributeSource getTransactionAttributeSource() { return transactionAttributeSource; } }; }
切点须要的事务属性源即上面建立的AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource。匹配是否事务管理由TransactionAttributeSourcePointcut中的matches方法决定。
@Override public boolean matches(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) { if (targetClass != null && TransactionalProxy.class.isAssignableFrom(targetClass)) { return false; } TransactionAttributeSource tas = getTransactionAttributeSource(); // 判断是否事务管理 return (tas == null || tas.getTransactionAttribute(method, targetClass) != null); }
getTransactionAttribute方法执行的是AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource父类AbstractFallbackTransactionAttributeSource中的方法
public TransactionAttribute getTransactionAttribute(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) { if (method.getDeclaringClass() == Object.class) { return null; } // First, see if we have a cached value. Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(method, targetClass); Object cached = this.attributeCache.get(cacheKey); if (cached != null) { // Value will either be canonical value indicating there is no transaction attribute, // or an actual transaction attribute. if (cached == NULL_TRANSACTION_ATTRIBUTE) { return null; } else { return (TransactionAttribute) cached; } } else { // We need to work it out. // 没有缓存,根据方法和Class对象计算事务属性 TransactionAttribute txAttr = computeTransactionAttribute(method, targetClass); // Put it in the cache. if (txAttr == null) { this.attributeCache.put(cacheKey, NULL_TRANSACTION_ATTRIBUTE); } else { String methodIdentification = ClassUtils.getQualifiedMethodName(method, targetClass); if (txAttr instanceof DefaultTransactionAttribute) { ((DefaultTransactionAttribute) txAttr).setDescriptor(methodIdentification); } if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) { logger.debug("Adding transactional method '" + methodIdentification + "' with attribute: " + txAttr); } this.attributeCache.put(cacheKey, txAttr); } return txAttr; } }
这里增长了一层缓存,第一次调用时执行computeTransactionAttribute方法
protected TransactionAttribute computeTransactionAttribute(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) { // Don't allow no-public methods as required. // 只容许public方法 if (allowPublicMethodsOnly() && !Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())) { return null; } // Ignore CGLIB subclasses - introspect the actual user class. // 忽略CGLIB生成的对象,找到实际用户使用的Class Class<?> userClass = (targetClass != null ? ClassUtils.getUserClass(targetClass) : null); // The method may be on an interface, but we need attributes from the target class. // If the target class is null, the method will be unchanged. // 从接口方法找到实际的实现类方法 Method specificMethod = ClassUtils.getMostSpecificMethod(method, userClass); // If we are dealing with method with generic parameters, find the original method. // 若是方法上存在泛型,转换获取真正的方法 specificMethod = BridgeMethodResolver.findBridgedMethod(specificMethod); // First try is the method in the target class. // 从方法上获取事务对象 TransactionAttribute txAttr = findTransactionAttribute(specificMethod); if (txAttr != null) { return txAttr; } // Second try is the transaction attribute on the target class. // 方法不存在的话,从类上获取事务对象 txAttr = findTransactionAttribute(specificMethod.getDeclaringClass()); if (txAttr != null && ClassUtils.isUserLevelMethod(method)) { return txAttr; } if (specificMethod != method) { // Fallback is to look at the original method. txAttr = findTransactionAttribute(method); if (txAttr != null) { return txAttr; } // Last fallback is the class of the original method. txAttr = findTransactionAttribute(method.getDeclaringClass()); if (txAttr != null && ClassUtils.isUserLevelMethod(method)) { return txAttr; } } return null; }
@Transactional的优先级是:方法注解 > 类注解,这里的findTransactionAttribute执行的类就是AnnotationTransactionAttributeSource。
切面类配置完成后,须要绑定到Bean的生命周期中,这样在Bean建立时执行AOP代理,所以咱们须要自动代理配置(关于自动代理,请见Spring源码-AOP(六)-自动代理与DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator)。
在tx:annotation-driven解析的开始,就注册了AOP的自动代理。
AopNamespaceUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(parserContext, element);
由AopConfigUtils统一配置
public static void registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary( ParserContext parserContext, Element sourceElement) { // 注册自动代理BeanDefinition BeanDefinition beanDefinition = AopConfigUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary( parserContext.getRegistry(), parserContext.extractSource(sourceElement)); // aop属性配置 useClassProxyingIfNecessary(parserContext.getRegistry(), sourceElement); registerComponentIfNecessary(beanDefinition, parserContext); }
自动代理BeanDefinition配置为InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator,只对Advisor的role为ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE代理
public static BeanDefinition registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, @Nullable Object source) { return registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired(InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.class, registry, source); }
InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator继承AbstractAdvisorAutoProxyCreator,重写isEligibleAdvisorBean方法,判断适合的Advisor。
protected boolean isEligibleAdvisorBean(String beanName) { return (this.beanFactory != null && this.beanFactory.containsBeanDefinition(beanName) && this.beanFactory.getBeanDefinition(beanName).getRole() == BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE); }
自动代理的核心基类AbstractAutoProxyCreator实现了SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor接口,在Bean初始化完成后,查找全部Advisor,并过滤切点包含本身的Advisor,详细时间见Spring源码-AOP(六)-自动代理与DefaultAdvisorAutoProxyCreator)。
对于事务拦截器TransactionInterceptor的实现过程已经在Spring事务管理(二)-TransactionProxyFactoryBean原理说明了,这里就不赘述了。