分位数回归(Quantile Regression)是计量经济学的研究前沿方向之一,它利用解释变量的多个分位数(例如四分位、十分位、百分位等)来获得被解释变量的条件分布的相应的分位数方程。html
与传统的OLS只获得均值方程相比,分位数回归能够更详细地描述变量的统计分布。它是给定回归变量X,估计响应变量Y条件分位数的一个基本方法;它不只能够度量回归变量在分布中心的影响,并且还能够度量在分布上尾和下尾的影响,所以较之经典的最小二乘回归具备独特的优点。众所周知,经典的最小二乘回归是针对因变量的均值(指望)的:模型反映了因变量的均值怎样受自变量的影响,
web
quantreg即:Quantile Regression,拥有条件分位数模型的估计和推断方法,包括线性、非线性和非参模型;处理单变量响应的条件分位数方法;处理删失数据的几种方法。此外,还包括基于预期风险损失的投资组合选择方法。dom
library(quantreg) # 载入quantreg包 data(engel) # 加载quantreg包自带的数据集 分位数回归(tau = 0.5) fit1 = rq(foodexp ~ income, tau = 0.5, data = engel) r1 = resid(fit1) # 获得残差序列,并赋值为变量r1 c1 = coef(fit1) # 获得模型的系数,并赋值给变量c1 summary(fit1) # 显示分位数回归的模型和系数 ` Call: rq(formula = foodexp ~ income, tau = 0.5, data = engel) tau: [1] 0.5 Coefficients: coefficients lower bd upper bd (Intercept) 81.48225 53.25915 114.01156 income 0.56018 0.48702 0.60199 ` summary(fit1, se = "boot") # 经过设置参数se,能够获得系数的假设检验 ` Call: rq(formula = foodexp ~ income, tau = 0.5, data = engel) tau: [1] 0.5 Coefficients: Value Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 81.48225 27.57092 2.95537 0.00344 income 0.56018 0.03507 15.97392 0.00000 ` 分位数回归(tau = 0.五、0.75) fit1 = rq(foodexp ~ income, tau = 0.5, data = engel) fit2 = rq(foodexp ~ income, tau = 0.75, data = engel) 模型比较 anova(fit1,fit2) #方差分析 ` Quantile Regression Analysis of Deviance Table Model: foodexp ~ income Joint Test of Equality of Slopes: tau in { 0.5 0.75 } Df Resid Df F value Pr(>F) 1 1 469 12.093 0.0005532 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 ` 画图比较分析 plot(engel$foodexp , engel$income,pch=20, col = "#2E8B57", main = "家庭收入与食品支出的分位数回归",xlab="食品支出",ylab="家庭收入") lines(fitted(fit1), engel$income,lwd=2, col = "#EEEE00") lines(fitted(fit2), engel$income,lwd=2, col = "#EE6363") legend("topright", c("tau=.5","tau=.75"), lty=c(1,1), col=c("#EEEE00","#EE6363"))
不一样分位点的回归比较 fit = rq(foodexp ~ income, tau = c(0.05,0.25,0.5,0.75,0.95), data = engel) plot( summary(fit))
data(barro) fit1 <- rq(y.net ~ lgdp2 + fse2 + gedy2 + Iy2 + gcony2, data = barro,tau=.25) fit2 <- rq(y.net ~ lgdp2 + fse2 + gedy2 + Iy2 + gcony2, data = barro,tau=.50) fit3 <- rq(y.net ~ lgdp2 + fse2 + gedy2 + Iy2 + gcony2, data = barro,tau=.75) # 替代方式 fit <- rq(y.net ~ lgdp2 + fse2 + gedy2 + Iy2 + gcony2, method = "fn", tau = 1:4/5, data = barro) anova(fit1,fit2,fit3) # 不一样分位点模型比较-方差分析 anova(fit1,fit2,fit3,joint=FALSE) ` Quantile Regression Analysis of Deviance Table Model: y.net ~ lgdp2 + fse2 + gedy2 + Iy2 + gcony2 Tests of Equality of Distinct Slopes: tau in { 0.25 0.5 0.75 } Df Resid Df F value Pr(>F) lgdp2 2 481 1.0656 0.34535 fse2 2 481 2.6398 0.07241 . gedy2 2 481 0.7862 0.45614 Iy2 2 481 0.0447 0.95632 gcony2 2 481 0.0653 0.93675 --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Warning message: In summary.rq(x, se = se, covariance = TRUE) : 1 non-positive fis ` 不一样分位点拟合曲线的比较 plot(barro$y.net,pch=20, col = "#2E8B57", main = "不一样分位点拟合曲线的比较") lines(fitted(fit1),lwd=2, col = "#FF00FF") lines(fitted(fit2),lwd=2, col = "#EEEE00") lines(fitted(fit3),lwd=2, col = "#EE6363") legend("topright", c("tau=.25","tau=.50","tau=.75"), lty=c(1,1), col=c( "#FF00FF","#EEEE00","#EE6363"))
library(zoo) data("AirPassengers", package = "datasets") ap <- log(AirPassengers) fm <- dynrq(ap ~ trend(ap) + season(ap), tau = 1:4/5) ` Dynamic quantile regression "matrix" data: Start = 1949(1), End = 1960(12) Call: dynrq(formula = ap ~ trend(ap) + season(ap), tau = 1:4/5) Coefficients: tau= 0.2 tau= 0.4 tau= 0.6 tau= 0.8 (Intercept) 4.680165533 4.72442529 4.756389747 4.763636251 trend(ap) 0.122068032 0.11807467 0.120418846 0.122603451 season(ap)Feb -0.074408403 -0.02589716 -0.006661952 -0.013385535 season(ap)Mar 0.082349382 0.11526821 0.114939193 0.106390507 season(ap)Apr 0.062351869 0.07079315 0.063283042 0.066870808 season(ap)May 0.064763333 0.08453454 0.069344618 0.087566554 season(ap)Jun 0.195099116 0.19998275 0.194786890 0.192013960 season(ap)Jul 0.297796876 0.31034824 0.281698714 0.326054871 season(ap)Aug 0.287624540 0.30491687 0.290142727 0.275755490 season(ap)Sep 0.140938329 0.14399906 0.134373833 0.151793646 season(ap)Oct 0.002821207 0.01175582 0.013443965 0.002691383 season(ap)Nov -0.154101220 -0.12176290 -0.124004759 -0.136538575 season(ap)Dec -0.031548941 -0.01893221 -0.023048200 -0.019458814 Degrees of freedom: 144 total; 131 residual ` sfm <- summary(fm) plot(sfm)
不一样分位点拟合曲线的比较 fm1 <- dynrq(ap ~ trend(ap) + season(ap), tau = .25) fm2 <- dynrq(ap ~ trend(ap) + season(ap), tau = .50) fm3 <- dynrq(ap ~ trend(ap) + season(ap), tau = .75) plot(ap,cex = .5,lwd=2, col = "#EE2C2C",main = "时间序列分位数回归") lines(fitted(fm1),lwd=2, col = "#1874CD") lines(fitted(fm2),lwd=2, col = "#00CD00") lines(fitted(fm3),lwd=2, col = "#CD00CD") legend("topright", c("原始拟合","tau=.25","tau=.50","tau=.75"), lty=c(1,1), col=c( "#EE2C2C","#1874CD","#00CD00","#CD00CD"),cex = 0.65)
除了本文介绍的以上内容,quantreg包还包含残差形态的检验、非线性分位数回归和半参数和非参数分位数回归等等,详细参见:用R语言进行分位数回归-詹鹏(北京师范大学经济管理学院)和Package ‘quantreg’。函数