话很少说,根据如下程序运行,打印的结果为何不一样?java
Integer a = 100; Integer b = 100; System.out.println(a == b);//print : true Integer a = 200; Integer b = 200; System.out.println(a == b);//print : false
以上两段代码在执行后为何会出现这样神奇的效果,纠察缘由在Integer的源码中一段特殊的代码,在代码中会在虚拟机加载时将-128至127的数据提早缓存到内存中,因此会致使双等号比较会出现不一致的问题(内存引用地址已缓存)。缓存
在开发中对象类型的比较必定记得使用eques进行内容比较。ide
/** * Cache to support the object identity semantics of autoboxing for values between * -128 and 127 (inclusive) as required by JLS. * * The cache is initialized on first usage. The size of the cache * may be controlled by the {@code -XX:AutoBoxCacheMax=<size>} option. * During VM initialization, java.lang.Integer.IntegerCache.high property * may be set and saved in the private system properties in the * sun.misc.VM class. */ private static class IntegerCache { static final int low = -128; static final int high; static final Integer cache[]; static { // high value may be configured by property int h = 127; String integerCacheHighPropValue = sun.misc.VM.getSavedProperty("java.lang.Integer.IntegerCache.high"); if (integerCacheHighPropValue != null) { try { int i = parseInt(integerCacheHighPropValue); i = Math.max(i, 127); // Maximum array size is Integer.MAX_VALUE h = Math.min(i, Integer.MAX_VALUE - (-low) -1); } catch( NumberFormatException nfe) { // If the property cannot be parsed into an int, ignore it. } } high = h; cache = new Integer[(high - low) + 1]; int j = low; for(int k = 0; k < cache.length; k++) cache[k] = new Integer(j++); // range [-128, 127] must be interned (JLS7 5.1.7) assert IntegerCache.high >= 127; } private IntegerCache() {} }