最近新装了一台Fedora 30系统,服务已经正常运行起来了,可是偶然发现当个人系统重启后,写在rc.local配置文件里的命令竟然没生效,致使我系统重启,可是服务却没有正常运行,后来通过一番查阅发现原来Fedora配置开机自启和CentOS存在一些区别,特此记录。vim
vim /etc/rc.d/rc.local
bash
#!/bin/bash nohup /root/frp/frpc -c /root/frp/frpc.ini & aria2c --conf-path=/root/Aria2/Aria2.conf -D
Fedora和CentOS的区别:socket
- CentOS自己存在
/etc/rc.local
配置文件,能够直接再此增长内容- CentOS配置文件中无须增长
#!/bin/bash
字头
Install
字段vim /lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service
ui
[Unit] Description=/etc/rc.d/rc.local Compatibility Documentation=man:systemd-rc-local-generator(8) ConditionFileIsExecutable=/etc/rc.d/rc.local After=network.target [Service] Type=forking ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/rc.local start TimeoutSec=0 RemainAfterExit=yes GuessMainPID=no [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target
若是不存在
Install
字段可能在设置rc-local服务开机自启时出现以下报错:this
The unit files have no installation config (WantedBy, RequiredBy, Also, Alias settings in the [Install] section, and DefaultInstance for template units). This means they are not meant to be enabled using systemctl. Possible reasons for having this kind of units are: 1) A unit may be statically enabled by being symlinked from another unit's .wants/ or .requires/ directory. 2) A unit's purpose may be to act as a helper for some other unit which has a requirement dependency on it. 3) A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer, D-Bus, udev, scripted systemctl call, ...). 4) In case of template units, the unit is meant to be enabled with some instance name specified.
chmod +x /etc/rc.d/rc.local
systemctl enable rc-local.service
systemctl start rc-local.service
systemctl status rc-local.service
code