PendingIntent 是个啥？官方文档描述的很到位。我给翻译翻译

博客原文: [11月的好奇心] PendingIntent 是啥？为何不少场景不能直接用 Intent 非要用 PendingIntent？

出于对 PendingIntent 的好奇心，翻阅了不少资料。最后发现仍是官方文档描述地到位。前三段话读下去已经解决了个人大部分疑惑。整篇读完有种豁然开朗的快感。 等翻译完，开始有点不解本身最初居然会有为何不直接使用 Intent 代替 PendingIntent？ 这样的问题。

总之，对于对 PendingIntent 尚有疑问的同窗来讲，这文档是真不错。

---

/**
 * A description of an Intent and target action to perform with it.  Instances
 * of this class are created with {@link #getActivity}, {@link #getActivities},
 * {@link #getBroadcast}, and {@link #getService}; the returned object can be
 * handed to other applications so that they can perform the action you
 * described on your behalf at a later time.
复制代码

这里说PendingIntent是Intent行为的描述类。相似于咱们用一个文件句柄，来讲明它所对应的文件。 它由这四个方法建立：getActivity getActivities getBroadcast getService。 它能够被其它应用调用以执行你预先声明的行为。

这里能够这么对比理解： FileDescriptor 用来描述文件 Socket 用来描述网络 PendingIntent 用来描述行为

若是把类名改成 IntentDescriptor 或许会更好理解。

---

*
 * <p>By giving a PendingIntent to another application,
 * you are granting it the right to perform the operation you have specified
 * as if the other application was yourself (with the same permissions and
 * identity).  As such, you should be careful about how you build the PendingIntent:
 * almost always, for example, the base Intent you supply should have the component
 * name explicitly set to one of your own components, to ensure it is ultimately
 * sent there and nowhere else.
 *
复制代码

把 PendingIntent 交给其它应用，你就授予了它们进行其所定义的行为的权利。 因此你建立 PendingIntent 必定要格外当心：记住在你定义的 Intent 中加上限制用的包名、类名，以确保它只被你但愿的对象使用。

这段是在说，我不只告诉你你该作啥，连权限也给你了。

这搁在军营中，就是一道虎符啊。因此必定要声明好把虎符具体交到谁的手中，否则会很危险。

---

* <p>A PendingIntent itself is simply a reference to a token maintained by
* the system describing the original data used to retrieve it.  This means
* that, even if its owning application's process is killed, the * PendingIntent itself will remain usable from other processes that * have been given it. If the creating application later re-retrieves the * same kind of PendingIntent (same operation, same Intent action, data, * categories, and components, and same flags), it will receive a PendingIntent * representing the same token if that is still valid, and can thus call * {@link #cancel} to remove it. * 复制代码

咱们如今知道 PendingIntent 其实就是个 IntentDescriptor 行为描述符，可是它存到哪里了呢？ maintained by the system，和文件同样，被系统维护。因此不管建立它的进程是否存在，它都和文件同样，被系统保存在了某个地方。只要你拥有“读取权限”，就能随时获取它。 若是建立 PendingIntent 的程序后来又要获取相同类型的 PendingIntent（相同的操做、相同的 Intent action、data、categories、component、flags），那么它会获取到和以前相同的 token, 前提是它仍然有效。此时你能够取消它，若是你但愿的话。

---

* <p>Because of this behavior, it is important to know when two Intents
* are considered to be the same for purposes of retrieving a PendingIntent.
* A common mistake people make is to create multiple PendingIntent objects
* with Intents that only vary in their "extra" contents, expecting to get
* a different PendingIntent each time.  This does <em>not</em> happen.  The
* parts of the Intent that are used for matching are the same ones defined
* by {@link Intent#filterEquals(Intent) Intent.filterEquals}. If you use two
* Intent objects that are equivalent as per
* {@link Intent#filterEquals(Intent) Intent.filterEquals}, then you will get
* the same PendingIntent for both of them.
*
复制代码

这段说，上面说过使用两个相同的 Intent 会获取到同一个 PendingIntent，那么什么样的 Intent 被认为是相同的呢？ 不少人常犯的错误是，认为只改变 Intent#extra 内容就能够获取到不一样的 PendingIntent。 而事实并不是如此。 Intent 是否相同经过 Intent.filterEquals 判断。见下图。只有这个方法返回 false, 才能获得不一样的 PendingIntent。

---

* <p>There are two typical ways to deal with this.
*
* <p>If you truly need multiple distinct PendingIntent objects active at
* the same time (such as to use as two notifications that are both shown
* at the same time), then you will need to ensure there is something that
* is different about them to associate them with different PendingIntents.
* This may be any of the Intent attributes considered by
* {@link Intent#filterEquals(Intent) Intent.filterEquals}, or different
* request code integers supplied to {@link #getActivity}, {@link #getActivities},
* {@link #getBroadcast}, or {@link #getService}.
*
* <p>If you only need one PendingIntent active at a time for any of the
* Intents you will use, then you can alternatively use the flags
* {@link #FLAG_CANCEL_CURRENT} or {@link #FLAG_UPDATE_CURRENT} to either
* cancel or modify whatever current PendingIntent is associated with the
* Intent you are supplying.
*/
复制代码

这段就比较啰嗦了，简单两句话说明

在某些场景有两种方法来避免获取到相同 PendingIntent：

1. 改变 Intent#filterEquals 中做为判断一句的某个字段
2. 获取 PendingIntent 时使用不一样的 requestCode

若是你有多个不一样的 Intent，但你只须要一个活动的 PendingIntent。那么你须要经过和它绑定的 Intent 来更新或移除它。