Primer Fields视频做者在BBS上的留言

I am the guy who made the Primer Fields video. Sorry for the length of this post, but is has to be long in order to address the issues I am seeing in some of the comments here. I just have time to make this post here and then back to work on the next videos and a paper for submission that covers my research. I hope to have PF2 up by Feb. 1. I will not be able to respond to any questions or comments here. I may read them and then address them in my upcoming videos for all to see and learn from.

我就是制做了<初子场域>视频的那我的。抱歉，接下来的帖子可能有点长，但为了阐述清楚问题我必须这么作。我如今正好有时间来发这个帖，而后紧接着制做初子场域视频的第二部和发表一篇关于个人研究的论文。我但愿能到 2 月 1 号前发表初子场域视频的第二部。我将不会在这里回应任何关于这个理论的疑问和评论。我可能会阅读它们并在接下来的视频中回应这些疑问和评论，以便全部人都能看见并学习。

Regarding intrinsic magnetic fields. All matter has intrinsic magnetic fields to it. Research this. All I did was change the shape of the source of the intrinsic magnetic fields. My main focus of my work has NOT been astrophysics, but physics at the atomic and sub-atomic level. The particles of matter at the LHC are driven around the LHC by MAGNETIC FIELDS. They are able to do this because of the intrinsic magnetic fields in all matter. Think this through carefully. It is based on repeatably proven science fact and experiments. Magnetic fields are intrinsic to all matter structures and that is undeniable fact. Trying to prove where they come from would be like asking me to prove water is wet. Think this through.

提到物质的固有磁场。全部物质都有固有磁场。研究它！我所作的只是改变了这个固有磁场的形状。我工做的主要关注点不是天文物理，而是原子物理或亚原子物理级别的研究。在 LHC(大型强子对撞机)中运行并碰撞的物质粒子是由磁场驱动的。他们能这样作，彻底是因为全部物质都有固有磁场。仔细思考这点！这是被可重复的实验事实证实了的。全部物质都有固有磁场，这是无可争议的事实。试图去验证这些磁场究竟来自哪里，就好像在验证水为何会是湿的同样。仔细思考这点！

They are there and I don't have to prove that as it is already accepted as fact. If you think that they can be electrically generated just on what we find in space, then I challenge you to prove it and not just say it.This is what true scientists do, they prove their statements. In six years of experiments I find zero evidence that these intrinsic magnetic fields are driven or generated by external electrical currents. I have run many many experiments without my magnetic emitters and I have seen zero evidence of this happening. If you go back and look at Birkleland's experiments you will notice that he had to put a source of a magnetic field into his sphere to find his Birkeland currents. No magnetic field no Birkeland currents. So the magnetic fields have to be there before any electricity is provided. Therefore the electricity did not form the magnetic fields and without magnetic fields you get no Birkeland currents.

它们(固有磁场)就在那里而且我没必要去验证这个已经被看成事实来接受了的事情。若是你认为它们(物质的固有磁场)能够由电来生成，那么我向你挑战:你去证实它，而不是只动动嘴。这是一个真正的科学家作的事情，他们会证实本身的声明。通过六年多的实验，我没有发现任何证据来证实：这些固有磁场是由外部电流产生的。我作了很是很是多的实验，若是没有磁场发射器，那么也就没有任何现象会产生。若是你去看看伯克兰(Kristian Olaf Birkeland)的实验(terrella experiment)，你会发现他不得不在他的圆球周围放一个磁场，只有这样作才能产生伯克兰电流(Birkeland currents)。没有磁场，也就没有伯克兰电流。因此，磁场必须在电流提供以前存在。所以，电不能产生磁而且没有磁场也就没有伯克兰电流。

The EUT is mostly correct and absolutely more correct than current mainstream AP. But there is no proof as to the source of the electricity.I am very aware of magneto hydrodynamics and in fact my theories use it, but you still have to prove that MHD is the real source and I see no evidence for that when it comes to externally powered stars etc. In fact if you carefully observe my experiments you will see the variance between my electrically driven plasma formation and the formations in space. They are NOT the same. They are similar in that the plasma reveals the shape of the fields. The steel ball experiments I show in the videos also do this WITHOUT electricity. I do this to show that electricity is NOT the driver of the formations we see in space, but in fact is produced by the formations we see in space. I have to be careful in how I present this evidence because I have working technology based on these theories and I have patents in the works. But in PF2 I will present the mechanism by which electricity is produced by the Sun.I DO NOT AGREE with the current mainstream view of the Sun as being internally fusion powered and I find that all evidence and hard data point directly away from this concept. So I do understand the EUT frustrations with the blindness in the mainstream. But I am not the mainstream. So do not try and say things against what I am saying until you can prove it. That is what I did. I kept my mouth closed until I had hard repeatable data.

EUT(Electric Universe Theory,电宇宙理论)绝大部分是正确的而且比目前主流的 AP(Atomic Physics,原子物理)理论更正确。可是没有证据代表电的来源。我很是关心磁流体力学，事实上个人理论中使用了它，可是你仍然须要证实MHD(Magnetohydrodynamics，磁流体)是真正的来源。在观察外部驱动的恒星时，我没有看到任何证据代表这点。事实上，若是你仔细观察个人实验，你会看到个人外加电极驱动的等离子形态和太空中的形态是有区别的。它们毫不相同！它们只是在等离子显示了磁场外形方面是类似的。我作的那个钢球实验，一样是喷射了物质，但却没必要外加电极。我作这个实验是为了说明：电并无驱动并运做咱们在太空中看到的形态，事实上电是被这种形态给制造出来的。我不得不谨慎的在实验中演示这个证据，由于我有相关的专利科技是基于这个理论的。可是在<初子场域 2>中，我将会演示这种机制，太阳就是经过这种机制来产生电流的。我毫不赞同当前主流界认为的，太阳是被内部的核聚变驱动并运行的理论，而且有明显的观测数据违背这一理论。因此，我很是能理解 EUT 工做者不被主流界接受时的沮丧心情。但我不是主流界的。因此，在你不能证实本身观点是否正确时，请不要试图说一些针对我理论的话，除非你能实验验证本身的观点。这就是个人工做方式。在没有明显可重复数据支持时，我一般会紧闭个人嘴。

But I do find that the Sun is fusion powered from the outside. Find the highest temperature and you have the place where fusion is greatest.Simple logic. Then as to the EUT, If the Sun were externally electrically powered we would not find these incredible temperature variances between the surface of the Sun and the corona-sphere. It would all be pretty much the same temperature. This is simple logic, backed by experiments. So in an externally powered Sun you have to explain the mechanism for the Solar interior being 5000K and the hottest areas in the corona-sphere being over 2 million K. IN fact you have to provide a mechanism for the interior of the Sun to be cooled as it is surrounded by the much hotter corona-sphere. That mechanism I cannot prove, but I do have a couple of ideas that I will expound on in my videos. Too much to discuss here.

可是我确实发现了太阳是在外部聚变的事实。找到了温度最高的地方，你就找到了聚变发生的确切位置。很简单的逻辑。接着说 EUT，若是太阳是被外部电极驱动的话，咱们将不会发现太阳光球区表层和日冕区之间很是巨大的温差。它们之间的温度将不会差太多。这是一个由我作实验，进而得出的简单逻辑。因此，若是你声称太阳是被外部电极驱动的话，你必须解释为何光球区表层温度只有5000 开尔文，而日冕区却高达 200 万开尔文。事实上，你必须提供一个太阳外热内冷的合理机制。这个机制我不能证实，但我确实有一些想法，我将会在接下来的视频中阐述个人这个观点。内容太多，以致在这里不能讲的太多。

My thinking that the Sun cannot be externally powered is also backed by experimental proof of little or no temperature variance in my experiments, which are indeed externally electrically driven. Therefore one must conclude that NASA et all is incorrect and the current EUT theory is incorrect based on repeatable experiments. Six years of experiments in fact.

我认为太阳不是被外部电极驱动的。这个观点一样是被实验数据支持的，那就是：实验中只有很小或者基本没有温度差别。所以，必需要得出一个结论，那就是：NASA 的电极理论所有是错的而且当前的 EUT 理论也是错误的。他们的错误都是基于可重复的实验证实了的。事实上，我作了六年的实验。

But again I do agree with the concepts of the EUT more than I agree with BH, DM, and DE, which I find no reason to exist and in fact I find zero proof that any of them exist.

可是相比 BH(黑洞),DM(暗物质),DE(暗能量)等理论，我更加赞同 EUT 理论。由于，我发现它们(BH,DM,DE)没理由存在，事实上我没有发现任何证据代表它们存在。

Furthermore. I am a plasma physicist as you can see. I know very well what a Z-pinch is. Please do not make comments that I don't realize I made a Z-pinch. To those who actually worked with Z-pinches a comment like that makes the whole EUT look really bad. What I made is not a Z-pinch at all. NOT AT ALL. Trying to say it does makes you look really really bad. Sorry, but it does. It makes those who really know how a Z-pinch really works pay no attention to anything else you say.I am sorry, but that is how these guys think.

此外，我是一个等离子物理学家，正如你看到的那样。我很是清楚什么是 Z-pinch。请不要发表评论说我没意识到我制做了一个 Z-pinch。对于那些真正工做在Z-pinch 领域的人来讲，这样的评论会让整个 EUT 界感到尴尬。我作的这个，绝对不是 Z-pinch！根本不是！试图说这样的话会让你感到很是很是尴尬。对不起，但确实是这样。那些真正懂得 Z-pinch 到底如何工做的人，根本会无视你的评论。对不起，但这些人确实是这么想的。

It would be like me telling you the moon is really made of cheese and then wondering why you won't listen to me. So really research what you believe, for your own sake.

这就好像：我告诉你月球的确是奶酪作的而且我很是疑惑为何你不这么想。因此，请仔细研究，你认为是对的东西，这也是对你本身负责。

I hope to work with the EU folks in the future and I have been in communication with them. But for now I must stand alone. There are currently some EU statements that are not scientifically backed by proven facts and indeed go against scientific fact. Z-pinchs are one of those statements, as is the externally powered Sun and stars.

我但愿在从此和 EU(Electric Universe)界的人一块儿工做，事实上我已经和他们中的一些人联系上了。可是如今，我必须独自站队。当前 EU 界的某些观点，并无可靠的事实数据支撑，事实上违反了科学事实。Z-pinch 就是这样的观点，还有就是恒星和太阳是被外部电极驱动的观点。

It is an electric universe and the electricity is generated around the stars. I can prove it. How do you generate electricity here on Earth. You move magnetic fields. This is what these intrinsic bowl shaped magnetic fields do, they cause magnetic fields to move very violently past each other, i.e. MHD, and guess what happens? You get electricity and the hottest points around the Sun are exactly where the greatest magnetic turbulence would take place. This in turn leads to fusion and the fusion provides the extra kick to keep it all going and generating electricity. So these theories account for where the electricity in the universe comes from and it all matches ALL the hard data. I really believe that endless clean power is near. Don't have it all worked out yet, but I do have tech that is based on these theories that is in over twelve countries right now. It works really well and it would not work if my theories were not correct. That technology has been the main focus of my research for the last six years. The AP stuff is just cool because it provides validation of my theories.

这是一个充满电的宇宙而且电被产生出来并围绕着恒星。我能证实它！你是怎么在地球上产生电的呢。移动磁场。这就是这些固有磁场作的事情，它们致使磁场之间猛烈的相互运动，例如：MHD(Magnetohydrodynamics，磁流体)，猜猜会发生什么？你获得了电流而且围绕太阳周围最热的地方正是磁场扰动最厉害的区域。这依次又致使了聚变发生，而且聚变提供了额外的震动来让这一切继续发生而且产生电流。因此，这个理论证实了宇宙中的电从哪里来，而且符合全部的观测数据。我真的相信，无尽的清洁能源正在临近。咱们尚未彻底作出来，可是我有基于这一理论的科技，能够在 12 个国家当即实现。它工做的很是好，若是个人理论是错的话，它将不会工做。在过去的六年里，我研究的主要内容就是这项科技。原子物理界的人士也很是酷，由于它们提供了对我理论的验证明验。

Please carefully considered what you type here. I have. I have patiently waited six years to go public with what I have. That is six years of 80 hours per week. Everything I say is backed by experiments and I have not had one mainstream physics or AP attack on any of my theories that I am aware of. All I have heard is their silence. In fact I have physicists who totally back all I say.

请仔细考虑你写下的每个字。我耐心的等待了六年后才走到前台来公布个人发现。这是六年的每周 80 小时的工做。我说的每个字都是有实验作支撑的而且没有任何主流物理界的人士或原子物理界的人士批判个人理论。我所听到的就是那里一片的寂静。事实上，我有一些物理学家朋友，他们彻底能够证实我此言不虚。

I know it is very frustrating to have the mainstream be so totally blind to some of the things the EUT calls for, but I am not mainstream and I am not your enemy. I am on your side more than I am on their side. I would suggest all of you take a step back and wait for the rest of my videos and my papers that I am working on as hard as I can. I only seek the truth and that is all. That is what every true scientist does.Just make sure you are seeking for the truth no matter where it leads, and not just trying to convince yourself that all you believe is true. That can be a very dangerous psychological trap that goes by the name of cognitive dissonance. This is the trap that I believe the mainstream has fallen into. I.E. our theories are correct and now we need patches to make our theories work.

我知道主流物理界对于 EUT 界的一些声明彻底无视，这很是使人沮丧。但我不是主流界的，因此我不是大家的敌人。我更倾向于站在大家这边，而不是主流界那边。我建议大家退后一步并等待我努力制做和发布的其他视频和论文。我只是在寻找真理，仅仅是这样。这正是每个真正的科学家作的事情。仅仅确保你在寻找真理，而无论它将致使何种结果，而不是仅仅试图说服本身你认为的就是对的。这会致使一个很是危险的心理陷阱，那就是认知不一致。这就是，我认为的主流物理界目前正陷入的一个陷阱。例如：咱们的理论是正确的而且咱们只须要对这理论作若干修补就能够了。

My approach is to try and shoot down my own theories and prove them incorrect. This approach has worked really well for me and any mistakes or problems are revealed when I do this. If I cannot prove something, I will not say it as a fact. If I say I believe that means I think that this is correct, but I cannot yet prove it, therefore it could be wrong. I think all of us should be like that, even NASA, even you, even me.

个人研究方法是试图证实本身的理论是错误的。这个研究方法对我很是合适，而且任何错误或疑问会被呈现出来当我作它的时候。若是我不能证实一些事情，我不会把它看成一个事实来讲。若是我说“我相信”，那意味着：我认为它是对的，可是我尚未验证它，所以它可能会错。我认为咱们你们应该会喜欢这样的，甚至是 NASA，甚至是你，甚至是我。

I hope you all understand where I am coming from.

我但愿，大家都知道我来自哪里了。

Cheers to all,
Dave

原帖地址：http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=9221&start=45

David is well

上图来自 G+账号: Rausch Zoltán
附上一些 wiki

铁磁流体(Ferrofluid)的信息:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrofluid
Kristian Olaf Birkeland(克里斯蒂安·伯克兰): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristian_Birkeland
MHD 和 Hannes Alfvén(汉尼斯·阿尔文): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n