war包即对WEB应用程序进行打包,用于应用容器的部署。如在jboss中只要把war包丢入deploy目录下便可发布本身的应用了。打包方式有不少中,不少工具自己就支持此功能。下面主要介绍经过maven来操做的两种方式:web
方法一:apache
即第一反应的那种啦,就是利用maven的maven-war-plugin。app
<build> <plugins> ...... <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.0.2</version> <configuration> <warSourceExcludes>WEB-INF/lib/log4j-${log4j.version}.jar</warSourceExcludes> </configuration> </plugin> </plugins> </build>
固然你能够指定war包的名称,输出的目录,webapp目录等等。dom
能够在须要打包的工程中直接设定:<pom>war</pom>webapp
这样在install的时候就会对此工程生成相应配置的war包,原来此web工程依赖的其余工程所有会以jar包的形式出如今lib目录下,因此不须要再去关心war包中集成的jar包是否完整,maven已经帮你作完了。maven
顺便提一句,在jboss中发布war包,若是包中包含log4j.jar,会报错,因此在本例中将此jar包排除在外。工具
方法二:ui
不用war插件,而是用到另外三个插件:maven-dependency-plugin 、maven-antrun-plugin 、 build-helper-maven-pluginspa
下面分别说明下着三个插件在此过程扮演的角色:操作系统
maven-dependency-plugin :至关于数据收集器,该依赖那些jar包,该加载那些resource信息。
maven-antrun-plugin:完成收集完文件夹的压缩和包的重命名。
build-helper-maven-plugin:让压缩包拥有男人本色,oh sorry 是war本色。
在写pom.xml配置前,先说明下目录结构
root
|
|---template
|
|---wardir
其中这两个目录都做为maven的独立工程,下面要写配置在wardir下的pom.xml中
<build> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.0</version> <executions> <execution> <id>create-structure</id> <phase>process-resources</phase> <goals> <goal>unpack</goal> </goals> <configuration> <artifactItems> <artifactItem> <groupId>GROUPID</groupId> <artifactId>template</artifactId> </artifactItem> </artifactItems> <outputDirectory> ${project.build.directory}/${assembly.name}.war </outputDirectory> </configuration> </execution> <execution> <id>copy-libs</id> <phase>process-resources</phase> <goals> <goal>copy</goal> </goals> <configuration> <artifactItems> <artifactItem> <groupId>jdom</groupId> <artifactId>jdom</artifactId> </artifactItem> ...... </artifactItems> <outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/${assembly.name}.war/WEB-INF/lib</outputDirectory> </configuration> </execution> </executions> </plugin> <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId> <version>1.3</version> <executions> <execution> <id>copy-config</id> <phase>process-resources</phase> <goals> <goal>run</goal> </goals> <configuration> <tasks> <copy todir="${project.build.directory}/${assembly.name}.war"> <fileset dir="src/main/resources" /> </copy> <zip destfile="${project.build.directory}/${assembly.name}-${project.version}-war.zip"> <zipfileset dir="${project.build.directory}/${assembly.name}.war" includes="**\*.*" excludes="*.zip" /> </zip> <copy file="${project.build.directory}/${assembly.name}-${project.version}-war.zip" tofile="${project.build.directory}/${assembly.name}-${project.version}.war" /> </tasks> </configuration> </execution> </executions> </plugin> <plugin> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> <artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId> <version>1.4</version> <executions> <execution> <id>attach-artifacts</id> <phase>package</phase> <goals> <goal>attach-artifact</goal> </goals> <configuration> <artifacts> <artifact> <file>${project.build.directory}/${assembly.name}-${project.version}.war</file> <type>war</type> </artifact> </artifacts> </configuration> </execution> </executions> </plugin> </plugins> </build>
固然这种方式也能够用来打war包。对于打无页面操做系统的war包,我的认为用后者更灵活,固然创建假web工程,再依赖工程,经过第一种方式一样能够达到最终的结果。看我的喜爱了。