前言:
最近的工做内容跟银行有些交互, 对方提供的数据格式采用xml(不是预期的json/protobuf). 为了开发方便, 须要借助jaxb来实现xml和java对象之间的映射. 它仍是有点像jackson, 经过简单的注解配置, 就能轻松实现json和java对象的互转. 不过笔者在java类中引入泛型时, 仍是踩了很多jaxb的坑, 这边作下笔记.java
实现的目标:
交互的数据格式和协议遵循通用的设计, 由header和body构成.
请求的数据格式以下:json
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <root> <!-- 请求头 --> <header></header> <request> <!-- 具体的请求参数, 根据接口而定 --> </request> </root>
响应的数据格式以下:app
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <root> <!-- 响应头 --> <header></header> <response> <!-- 具体的响应结果, 根据接口而定 --> </response> </root>
header信息头相对固定, 而具体的request/response取决于具体的业务接口, 在进行对象映射中, 咱们也是针对body消息体进行泛型化.测试
请求类抽象和测试代码:
针对请求的数据格式, 咱们能够轻易的设计以下类结构:ui
// *) 请求类(模板) @Getter @Setter @ToString public class Req<T> { private String header; private T value; } // *) 具体的实体请求 @Getter @Setter @ToString @AllArgsConstructor @NoArgsConstructor public class EchoBody { private String key; }
注: 这边的注解Getter/Setter/ToString等皆是lombok的注解.
测试代码以下:spa
public static void main(String[] args) { Req<EchoBody> req = new Req<EchoBody>(); req.setHeader("header"); req.setValue(new EchoBody("key")); try { StringWriter sw = new StringWriter(); JAXBContext context = JAXBContext.newInstance(req.getClass()); Marshaller marshaller = context.createMarshaller(); marshaller.setProperty(Marshaller.JAXB_FORMATTED_OUTPUT, true); marshaller.marshal(req, sw); System.out.println(sw.toString()); } catch (JAXBException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } }
注: 该代码主要测试对象到xml的转换是否顺利.设计
演进和迭代:
先来看初版本, 引入jaxb注解, 同时省略lombok注解.xml
@XmlRootElement(name="root") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public class Req<T> { @XmlElement(name="header",required = true) private String header; @XmlElement(name="request", required = true) private T value; } @XmlRootElement(name="request") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public class EchoBody { @XmlElement(name="key", required = true) private String key; }
运行测试的结果以下:对象
javax.xml.bind.MarshalException - with linked exception: [com.sun.istack.internal.SAXException2: class com.test.Test$EchoBody以及其任何超类对此上下文都是未知的。 javax.xml.bind.JAXBException: class com.test.Test$EchoBody以及其任何超类对此上下文都是未知的。] at com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.MarshallerImpl.write(MarshallerImpl.java:311) at com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.runtime.MarshallerImpl.marshal(MarshallerImpl.java:236) at javax.xml.bind.helpers.AbstractMarshallerImpl.marshal(AbstractMarshallerImpl.java:116) at com.test.Test.main(Test.java:55)
来首战遇到一些小挫折, 经过百度得知须要借助@XmlSeeAlso类规避该问题.
修改代码以下:blog
@XmlRootElement(name="root") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlSeeAlso({EchoBody.class}) public class Req<T> { @XmlElement(name="header",required = true) private String header; @XmlElement(name="request", required = true) private T value; } @XmlRootElement(name="request") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public class EchoBody { @XmlElement(name="key", required = true) private String key; }
运行后的输出结果以下:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <root> <header>header</header> <request xsi:type="echoBody" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <key>key</key> </request> </root>
看来很是的成功, 可是request标签里包含了xsi:type和xmlns:xsi这些属性, 可否把这些信息去除, 网上查阅得知, 借助@XmlAnyElement(lax = true)来达到目的, 再次修改版本.
@XmlRootElement(name="root") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlSeeAlso({EchoBody.class}) public class Req<T> { @XmlElement(name="header",required = true) private String header; @XmlAnyElement(lax = true) private T value; } @XmlRootElement(name="request") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public class EchoBody { @XmlElement(name="key", required = true) private String key; }
此次的结果能够称得上完美(perfect):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <root> <header>header</header> <request> <key>key</key> </request> </root>
响应类抽象和测试代码:
有了请求类的顺利结果, 咱们在设计响应类也是有迹可循.
响应类的代码以下:
@Getter @Setter @ToString public class Res<T> { private String header; private T value; } @Getter @Setter @ToString @AllArgsConstructor @NoArgsConstructor public class EchoAck { private String value; } @Getter @Setter @ToString @AllArgsConstructor @NoArgsConstructor public class HelloAck { private String key; }
注: 这边暂时隐去jaxb的注解, 剩下的都是lombok注解.
测试用例代码以下:
public static void main(String[] args) { String xml = "" + "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" ?>\n" + "<root>\n" + "\t<header>header_val</header>\n" + "\t<response>\n" + "\t\t<key>key_val</key>\n" + "\t</response>\n" + "</root>"; Res<HelloAck> res = new Res<HelloAck>(); try { JAXBContext jc = JAXBContext.newInstance(res.getClass()); Unmarshaller unmar = jc.createUnmarshaller(); Res<HelloAck> r = (Res<HelloAck>)unmar.unmarshal(new StringReader(xml)); System.out.println(r); } catch (JAXBException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } }
演进和迭代:
添加jaxb注解, 隐去lombok注解, 大体以下:
@XmlRootElement(name="root") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlSeeAlso({HelloAck.class, EchoAck.class}) public class Res<T> { @XmlElement(name="header",required = true) private String header; @XmlAnyElement(lax = true) private T value; } @XmlRootElement(name="response") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public class EchoAck { @XmlElement(name="value", required = true) private String value; } @XmlRootElement(name="response") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public class HelloAck { @XmlElement(name="key", required = true) private String key; }
运行的以下:
Res(header=header_val, value=EchoAck(value=null))
这边须要的注意的是, 代码中指定反解的类是HelloAck, 可是这边反解的类倒是EchoAck. 因而可知, jaxb在xml到对象转换时, 其泛型类的选取存在问题(猜想java泛型在编译时类型被擦去, 反射不能肯定具体那个类).
针对这种状况, 一个好的建议是, 单独引入实体类(wrapper), 网友的作法也是相似, 只是没有给出直接的理由.
@Getter @Setter @ToString @XmlTransient // 抽象基类改成注解XmlTransient, 切记 @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public abstract class Res<T> { @XmlElement(name="header",required = true) private String header; @XmlAnyElement(lax = true) private T value; } @Getter @Setter @ToString @AllArgsConstructor @NoArgsConstructor @XmlRootElement(name="response") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public class EchoAck { @XmlElement(name="value", required = true) private String value; } @Getter @Setter @ToString @AllArgsConstructor @NoArgsConstructor @XmlRootElement(name="response") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) public class HelloAck { @XmlElement(name="key", required = true) private String key; } @Getter @Setter @ToString(callSuper = true) @XmlRootElement(name="root") @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlSeeAlso({HelloAck.class}) public class HelloRes extends Res<HelloAck> { }
修改测试代码:
public static void main(String[] args) { String xml = "" + "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" ?>\n" + "<root>\n" + "\t<header>header_val</header>\n" + "\t<response>\n" + "\t\t<key>key_val</key>\n" + "\t</response>\n" + "</root>"; HelloRes res = new HelloRes(); try { JAXBContext jc = JAXBContext.newInstance(HelloRes.class); Unmarshaller unmar = jc.createUnmarshaller(); HelloRes r = (HelloRes)unmar.unmarshal(new StringReader(xml)); System.out.println(r); } catch (JAXBException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } }
运行结果以下:
HelloRes(super=Res(header=header_val, value=HelloAck(key=key_val)))
符合预期, 这边的作法就是wrap一个泛型类, 姑且能够理解为在编译前指定类, 避免反射出误差.
总结: 总的来讲jaxb在涉及泛型时, 仍是有一些坑的, 这边总结了一下. 不过总的来讲, 知其然不知其因此然, 希翼后面可以对jaxb的底层实现有个深刻的了解.