读写锁是计算机程序的并发控制的一种同步机制,用于解决读写问题,读操做可并发重入,写操做是互斥的。 读写锁有多种读写权限的优先级策略,能够设计为读优先、写优先或不指定优先级。java
不指定优先级的策略,最适合使用ZooKeeper的子节点模式来实现,今天就来尝试这种策略。并发
同前面介绍的普通分布式锁,也使用子节点模式实现。先用容器模式(CreateMode.CONTAINER)建立惟一的锁节点,每一个锁客户端在锁节点下使用临时循序模式(CreateMode. SEQUENTIAL)建立子节点。这些子节点会自动在名称后面追加10位数字。dom
有两种简单的方案:在子节点名中标识、在节点的值中标识。若是采用在值中标识,每次子节点列表后,还须要再分别读一会儿节点的值,才能判断是读锁仍是写锁,会比较耗时。若是在子节点名称中标识,会面临一个问题:在同一个节点中建立的子节点,若是给定的名称不一样,追加的10位数字是否仍然是递归的?分布式
写个测试用例验证一下。ide
1函数 2测试 3ui 4this 5spa 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 |
|
测试用例经过,说明在同一个Container中建立的子节点,不论提供的节点名是什么,后续追加的10位数字都是顺序递增的。这样,就可使用节点名来区分读锁和写锁。
介绍分布式锁的时候,已经建立了阻塞锁 ChildrenBlockingLock,读写锁正好能够基于这个类作重载。
写锁是一个独占锁,逻辑跟普通分布式锁相同,只要它以前有锁就必须等待。因此,彻底沿用阻塞锁的逻辑便可。
读锁容许并发,它以前能够有任意读锁,但不能有写锁。因此只须要判断有没有写锁便可。
这个类,主要是增长了一个获取排序后子节点列表的方法,这样方便实现读写锁的代码。固然,这个操做会增长一些耗时,若是子节点数量太大,可能不适用。
首先定义一个函数,用来返回子节点的前缀
/** 子节点的前缀,缺省是element,子类能够重载 */ protected String getChildPrefix() { return "element"; }
而后定义一个内部类,子节点排序时会用到
/** 子节点名称比较 */ private class StringCompare implements Comparator<String> { @Override public int compare(String string1, String string2) { return string1.substring(string1.length() - 10) .compareTo(string2.substring(string2.length() - 10)); } }
最后实现子节点排序方法,用于代替 getChildren 函数
/** 获取排好序的子节点列表 */ final public List<String> getOrderedChildren(String path, boolean watch) throws KeeperException, InterruptedException { List<String> children = getZooKeeper().getChildren(path, watch); Collections.sort(children, new StringCompare()); return children; }
在多客户端随机测试时,常常出现程序卡死的状况,没法正常退出。通过添加日志跟踪,发现WatchedEvent可能会丢失,也可能会发送给并非注册事件的ZooKeeper客户端。在网上搜索,发现不少人也碰到相似问题。
简单修改了一下ChildrenBlockingLock#isLockSuccess等待信号的代码,从无参数的死等变成设置必定超时时间等待。关键代码以下
protected boolean isLockSuccess() { boolean lockSuccess; try { while (true) { String prevElementName = getPrevElementName(); if (prevElementName == null) { log.trace("{} 没有更靠前的子节点,加锁成功", elementNodeName); lockSuccess = true; break; } else { // 有更小的节点,说明当前节点没抢到锁,注册前一个节点的监听。 log.trace("{} 监控 {} 的事件", elementNodeName, prevElementName); getZooKeeper().exists(this.guidNodeName + "/" + prevElementName, true); synchronized (mutex) { // 等待最多一秒 mutex.wait(1000); log.trace("{} 监控的 {} 有子节点变化", elementNodeName, guidNodeName); } } } } catch (KeeperException e) { lockSuccess = false; } catch (InterruptedException e) { lockSuccess = false; } return lockSuccess; }
代码基本是沿用父类,只须要重载getChildPrefix()方法,
/** 返回写锁的前缀 */ protected String getChildPrefix() { return "w-lock-"; }
同写锁相比,除了重载getChildPrefix()方法,还重载了getPrevElementName()用来查找最近一个写锁。
/** 返回读锁的前缀 */ protected String getChildPrefix() { return "r-lock-"; } /** 是写锁 */ private boolean isWriteLock(String elementName) { return elementName.startsWith(ZooKeeperWriteLock.FLAG); } /** 读取前一个写锁 */ protected String getPrevElementName() throws KeeperException, InterruptedException { List<String> elementNames = super.getOrderedChildren(this.guidNodeName, false); super.traceOrderedChildren(this.guidNodeName, elementNames); String prevWriteElementName = null; for (String oneElementName : elementNames) { if (this.elementNodeFullName.endsWith(oneElementName)) { // 已经到了当前节点 break; } if (isWriteLock(oneElementName)) { prevWriteElementName = oneElementName; } } return prevWriteElementName; }
测试用例没想到好的判断方法,很难使用assert判断结果,所以作了简化,根据日志输出,靠人眼判断是否正确。
分别为都锁和写锁构建了两个内部类
/** 写锁线程 */ class WriteLockClient extends Thread { ZooKeeperWriteLock writeLock; public WriteLockClient() { try { this.writeLock = new ZooKeeperWriteLock(address); } catch (IOException e) { } } public void run() { writeLock.lock(guidNodeName, this.getName()); try { Thread.sleep(1000 + random.nextInt(20) * 100); } catch (InterruptedException e) { } writeLock.release(guidNodeName, this.getName()); } } /** 读锁线程 */ class ReadLockClient extends Thread { ZooKeeperReadLock readLock; public ReadLockClient() { try { this.readLock = new ZooKeeperReadLock(address); } catch (IOException e) { } } public void run() { readLock.lock(guidNodeName, this.getName()); try { Thread.sleep(1000 + random.nextInt(20) * 100); } catch (InterruptedException e) { } readLock.release(guidNodeName, this.getName()); try { readLock.getZooKeeper().close(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { } } }
代码
@Test public void testReadRead() throws IOException, InterruptedException { ReadLockClient readLock1 = new ReadLockClient(); ReadLockClient readLock2 = new ReadLockClient(); readLock1.start(); readLock2.start(); readLock1.join(); readLock2.join(); }
测试结果能够看到,两个读锁并发执行
22:18.861 [Thread-2 INFO] r-lock-0000000000 get read lock : true 22:18.865 [Thread-1 INFO] r-lock-0000000001 get read lock : true 22:20.065 [Thread-2 INFO] r-lock-0000000000 release read lock 22:21.366 [Thread-1 INFO] r-lock-0000000001 release read lock
代码
@Test public void testReadWrite() throws IOException, InterruptedException { ReadLockClient readLock1 = new ReadLockClient(); WriteLockClient writeLock1 = new WriteLockClient(); readLock1.start(); Thread.sleep(50); writeLock1.start(); readLock1.join(); writeLock1.join(); }
测试结果能够看到,首先获取读锁,释放以后才获取到写锁。
27:40.800 [Thread-1 INFO] r-lock-0000000000 get read lock : true 27:43.310 [Thread-1 INFO] r-lock-0000000000 release read lock 27:43.423 [Thread-2 INFO] w-lock-0000000001 get write lock : true 27:44.423 [Thread-2 INFO] w-lock-0000000001 release write lock
代码
@Test public void testWriteRead() throws IOException, InterruptedException { ReadLockClient readLock1 = new ReadLockClient(); WriteLockClient writeLock1 = new WriteLockClient(); writeLock1.start(); Thread.sleep(50); readLock1.start(); writeLock1.join(); readLock1.join(); }
测试结果能够看到,首先获取写锁,释放以后才获取到读锁。
29:17.661 [Thread-2 INFO] w-lock-0000000000 get write lock : true 29:19.966 [Thread-2 INFO] w-lock-0000000000 release write lock 29:19.976 [Thread-1 INFO] r-lock-0000000001 get read lock : true 29:22.476 [Thread-1 INFO] r-lock-0000000001 release read lock
测试代码
@Test public void testRandomReadWriteLock() throws IOException, InterruptedException { int threadCount = 20; Thread[] lockThreads = new Thread[threadCount]; for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) { // 必定几率是写锁 boolean writeLock = random.nextInt(5) == 0; if (writeLock) { lockThreads[i] = new WriteLockClient(); } else { lockThreads[i] = new ReadLockClient(); } lockThreads[i].start(); } for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) { lockThreads[i].join(); } }
测试结果能够看出,若是连续多个读锁会并发执行。为了方便查看,我添加了一些横线分隔。
30:31.317 [Thread-1 INFO] w-lock-0000000000 get write lock : true 30:32.824 [Thread-1 INFO] w-lock-0000000000 release write lock ------------------------------------------------------------------ 30:32.834 [Thread-17 INFO] r-lock-0000000004 get read lock : true 30:32.835 [Thread-19 INFO] r-lock-0000000002 get read lock : true 30:32.835 [Thread-20 INFO] r-lock-0000000001 get read lock : true 30:32.836 [Thread-18 INFO] r-lock-0000000003 get read lock : true 30:34.135 [Thread-20 INFO] r-lock-0000000001 release read lock 30:34.634 [Thread-17 INFO] r-lock-0000000004 release read lock 30:34.935 [Thread-19 INFO] r-lock-0000000002 release read lock 30:35.036 [Thread-18 INFO] r-lock-0000000003 release read lock ------------------------------------------------------------------ 30:35.053 [Thread-16 INFO] w-lock-0000000005 get write lock : true 30:36.154 [Thread-16 INFO] w-lock-0000000005 release write lock ------------------------------------------------------------------ 30:36.160 [Thread-14 INFO] r-lock-0000000007 get read lock : true 30:36.160 [Thread-15 INFO] r-lock-0000000006 get read lock : true 30:38.160 [Thread-14 INFO] r-lock-0000000007 release read lock 30:38.661 [Thread-15 INFO] r-lock-0000000006 release read lock ------------------------------------------------------------------ 30:38.669 [Thread-13 INFO] w-lock-0000000008 get write lock : true 30:39.969 [Thread-13 INFO] w-lock-0000000008 release write lock ------------------------------------------------------------------ 30:39.976 [Thread-12 INFO] r-lock-0000000009 get read lock : true 30:39.977 [Thread-8 INFO] r-lock-0000000014 get read lock : true 30:39.977 [Thread-6 INFO] r-lock-0000000015 get read lock : true 30:39.984 [Thread-10 INFO] r-lock-0000000011 get read lock : true 30:39.985 [Thread-3 INFO] r-lock-0000000018 get read lock : true 30:39.984 [Thread-7 INFO] r-lock-0000000013 get read lock : true 30:39.984 [Thread-11 INFO] r-lock-0000000010 get read lock : true 30:39.983 [Thread-9 INFO] r-lock-0000000012 get read lock : true 30:39.983 [Thread-2 INFO] r-lock-0000000019 get read lock : true 30:39.982 [Thread-5 INFO] r-lock-0000000016 get read lock : true 30:39.986 [Thread-4 INFO] r-lock-0000000017 get read lock : true 30:40.986 [Thread-3 INFO] r-lock-0000000018 release read lock 30:41.086 [Thread-2 INFO] r-lock-0000000019 release read lock 30:41.285 [Thread-6 INFO] r-lock-0000000015 release read lock 30:41.576 [Thread-12 INFO] r-lock-0000000009 release read lock 30:42.185 [Thread-10 INFO] r-lock-0000000011 release read lock 30:42.186 [Thread-5 INFO] r-lock-0000000016 release read lock 30:42.187 [Thread-11 INFO] r-lock-0000000010 release read lock 30:42.286 [Thread-9 INFO] r-lock-0000000012 release read lock 30:42.586 [Thread-7 INFO] r-lock-0000000013 release read lock 30:42.677 [Thread-8 INFO] r-lock-0000000014 release read lock 30:42.887 [Thread-4 INFO] r-lock-0000000017 release read lock