transformjs在非react领域用得风生水起,那么react技术栈的同窗能用上吗?答案是能够的。junexie童鞋已经造了个react版本。css
传统 web 动画的两种方式:html
对应在react中:node
使用CSS3react
纯粹JS控制时间轴css3
这里很明显,方案1和方案2可应对简单场景(如没有prop change 回调等),方案3可编程性最大,最灵活,能够适合复杂的动画场景或者承受复杂的交互场景。git
npm install css3transform-react
//set "translateX", "translateY", "translateZ", "scaleX", "scaleY", "scaleZ", "rotateX", "rotateY", "rotateZ", "skewX", "skewY", "originX", "originY", "originZ" render() { return ( <Transform translateX={100} scaleX={0.5} originX={0.5}> <div>sth</div> </Transform> ); } // you can also use other porps, such as "className" or "style" render() { return ( <Transform translateX={100} className="ani" style={{width: '100px', background: 'red'}} <div>sth</div> </Transform> ); }
经过上面的声明,就能够设置或者读取"translateX", "translateY", "translateZ", "scaleX", "scaleY", "scaleZ", "rotateX", "rotateY", "rotateZ", "skewX", "skewY", "originX", "originY", "originZ"!github
方便吧!web
import React, { Component } from 'react'; import { render } from 'react-dom'; import Transform from '../../transform.react.js'; class Root extends Component { constructor(props, context) { super(props, context); this.state = { el1: {rotateZ: 0}, el2: {rotateY: 0} }; this.animate = this.animate.bind(this); } animate() { this.setState({ el1: {rotateZ: this.state.el1.rotateZ + 1}, el2: {rotateY: this.state.el2.rotateY + 1} }, () => { requestAnimationFrame(this.animate); }); } componentDidMount() { setTimeout(this.animate, 500); } render() { return ( <div> <Transform rotateZ={this.state.el1.rotateZ} className="test" style={{'backgroundColor': 'green'}}> transformjs </Transform> <Transform rotateY={this.state.el2.rotateY} className="test" style={{'backgroundColor': 'red', 'left': '200px'}}> transformjs </Transform> </div> ); } } render( <Root />, document.getElementById('root') );
更加复杂的详细的使用代码能够看这里:https://github.com/AlloyTeam/AlloyTouch/blob/master/transformjs/react/example/src/index.jsxchrome
http://alloyteam.github.io/AlloyTouch/transformjs/react/example/npm
由于react版本会有diff过程,而后apply diff to dom的过程,state改变不会整个innerHTML所有替换,因此对浏览器渲染来讲仍是很便宜,可是在js里diff的过程的耗时仍是须要去profiles一把,若是耗时严重,不在webworker里跑仍是会卡住UI线程致使卡顿,交互延缓等。因此要看一看CPU的耗时仍是颇有必要的。
主要是那上面的演示和传统的直接操做dom的方式对比。就是下面这种传统的方式:
var element1 = document.querySelector("#test1"); Transform(element1); ... ... function animate() { element1.rotateZ++; ... requestAnimationFrame(animate); } animate();
对两种方式使用chrome profiles了一把。
先看总耗时对比:
react:
传统方式:
在不进行profiles就能想象到react是必定会更慢一些,由于state的改变要走把react生命周期走一遍,可是能够看到react的耗时仍是在能够接受的范围。可是,咱们仍是但愿找到拖慢的函数来。
那么在使用transformjs react版本中,哪一个函数拖了后腿?展开profiles tree能够看到:
就是它了。
/** * Reconciles the properties by detecting differences in property values and * updating the DOM as necessary. This function is probably the single most * critical path for performance optimization. * * TODO: Benchmark whether checking for changed values in memory actually * improves performance (especially statically positioned elements). * TODO: Benchmark the effects of putting this at the top since 99% of props * do not change for a given reconciliation. * TODO: Benchmark areas that can be improved with caching. * * @private * @param {object} lastProps * @param {object} nextProps * @param {?DOMElement} node */ _updateDOMProperties: function (lastProps, nextProps, transaction) {
打开对应的代码能够看到。注释里已经写了这是优化重点。
官方网站:http://alloyteam.github.io/AlloyTouch/transformjs/
Github地址:https://github.com/AlloyTeam/AlloyTouch/tree/master/transformjs
任何问题和意见欢迎new issue给咱们。