复制文件的大小为2.5G,对比一下使用FileOutputStream和BufferedOutputStream的效率windows
我理解,使用文件流对文件进行读写和复制,和在windows上使用鼠标点击文件复制本质上应该是同样的code
使用正常的FileOutputStream复制文件:ip
private static void transfer() { long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis(); File file = new File("d:\\CPMS.zip"); FileInputStream fis = null; FileOutputStream fos = null; try { fis = new FileInputStream(file); fos = new FileOutputStream(new File("D:\\downloads\\" + file.getName())); int length = 0; byte[] b = new byte[1024]; while ((length = fis.read(b)) != -1) { fos.write(b, 0, length); } } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { if (fis != null) { try { fis.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if (fos != null) { try { fos.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("复制文件用时:" + (t2 - t1) + " ms"); }
控制台输出get
复制文件用时:22115 ms
使用BufferedOutputStream复制文件:it
private static void copyFile() { long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis(); File file = new File("D:\\CPMS.zip"); FileInputStream fis = null; BufferedInputStream bis = null; BufferedOutputStream bos = null; FileOutputStream fos = null; try { fis = new FileInputStream(file); bis = new BufferedInputStream(fis); fos = new FileOutputStream(new File("D:\\downloads\\" + file.getName())); bos = new BufferedOutputStream(fos); int length = 0; byte[] b = new byte[1024]; while ((length = fis.read(b)) != -1) { bos.write(b, 0, length); } bos.flush(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { if (fis != null) { try { fis.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if (bis != null) { try { bis.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if (fos != null) { try { fos.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if (bos != null) { try { bos.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("复制文件用时:" + (t2 - t1) + " ms"); }
控制台输出io
复制文件用时:11974 ms
看上去时间差异挺大的,因此建议仍是使用缓冲流来读写文件,提升效率效率