mysql的事物隔离机制?

1.事物隔离级别html

隔离级别 脏读 不可重复读 幻读
未提交读(Read uncommitted 可能  可能 可能
已提交读(Read committed)    不可能  可能 可能
可重复读(Repeatable read)  不可能  不可能  可能
可串行化(Serializable )  不可能  不可能  不可能 

==============================================================mysql

·未提交读(Read Uncommitted):容许脏读,也就是可能读取到其余会话中未提交事务修改的数据sql

·提交读(Read Committed):只能读取到已经提交的数据。Oracle等多数数据库默认都是该级别 (不重复读)数据库

·可重复读(Repeated Read):可重复读。在同一个事务内的查询都是事务开始时刻一致的,InnoDB默认级别。在SQL标准中,该隔离级别消除了不可重复读,可是还存在幻象读session

·串行读(Serializable):彻底串行化的读,每次读都须要得到表级共享锁,读写相互都会阻塞spa

==============================================================rest

脏读: 脏读就是指当一个事务正在访问数据,而且对数据进行了修改,而这种修改尚未提交到数据库中,这时,另一个事务也访问这个数据,而后使用了这个数据。code

session 1:
mysql> select @@global.tx_isolation;
+-----------------------+
| @@global.tx_isolation |
+-----------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ       |
+-----------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select @@session.tx_isolation;
+-----------------------+
| @@session.tx_isolation |
+-----------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ       |
+-----------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> start transaction;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> insert into ttd values(1);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.05 sec)

mysql> select * from ttd;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |
+------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

session 2:
mysql> select @@session.tx_isolation;
+------------------------+
| @@session.tx_isolation |
+------------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ        |
+------------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select @@global.tx_isolation;
+-----------------------+
| @@global.tx_isolation |
+-----------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ   |        --------该隔离级别下(除了 read uncommitted)
+-----------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from ttd;
Empty set (0.00 sec)              --------不会出现脏读

mysql> set session transaction isolation level read uncommitted;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> select @@session.tx_isolation;
+------------------------+
| @@session.tx_isolation |
+------------------------+
| READ-UNCOMMITTED       |   --------该隔离级别下
+------------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from ttd;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |                                       --------REPEATABLE-READ级别出现脏读

+------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

结论:session 2 在READ-UNCOMMITTED 下读取到session 1 中未提交事务修改的数据.htm

② 不可重复读:是指在一个事务内,屡次读同一数据。在这个事务尚未结束时,另一个事务也访问该同一数据。那么,在第一个事务中的两次读数据之间,因为第二个事务的修改,那么第一个事务两次读到的的数据多是不同的。这样就发生了在一个事务内两次读到的数据是不同的,所以称为是不可重复读。blog

session 1:
mysql> select @@session.tx_isolation;
+------------------------+
| @@session.tx_isolation |
+------------------------+
| READ-COMMITTED         |
+------------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> start transaction;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from ttd;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |
+------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

session 2 :

mysql> select @@session.tx_isolation;
+------------------------+
| @@session.tx_isolation |
+------------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ        |
+------------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> start transaction;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from ttd;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |
+------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> insert into ttd values(2);  /也能够更新数据
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from ttd;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |
|    2 |
+------+
rows in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> commit;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)

session 2 提交后,查看session 1 的结果;

session 1:

mysql> select * from ttd;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |                             --------和第一次的结果不同,READ-COMMITTED 级别出现了不重复读
|    2 |
+------+
rows in set (0.00 sec)

可重复读:

session 1:
mysql> select @@session.tx_isolation;
+------------------------+
| @@session.tx_isolation |
+------------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ        |
+------------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> start transaction;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from ttd;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |
|    2 |
+------+
rows in set (0.00 sec)

session 2 :

mysql> select @@session.tx_isolation;
+------------------------+
| @@session.tx_isolation |
+------------------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ        |
+------------------------+
row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> start transaction;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> insert into ttd values(3);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> commit;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec)

session 2 提交后,查看session 1 的结果;

session 1:

mysql> select * from ttd;
+------+
| id   |
+------+
|    1 |                                      --------和第一次的结果同样,REPEATABLE-READ级别出现了重复读
|    2 |
+------+
rows in set (0.00 sec)

(commit session 1 以后 再select * from ttd 能够看到session 2 插入的数据3)

④ 幻读:第一个事务对一个表中的数据进行了修改,这种修改涉及到表中的所有数据行。同时,第二个事务也修改这个表中的数据,这种修改是向表中插入一行新数据。那么,之后就会发生操做第一个事务的用户发现表中还有没有修改的数据行,就好象发生了幻觉同样。

mysql>CREATE TABLE `t_bitfly` (
`id` bigint(20) NOT NULL default '0',
`value` varchar(32) default NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB

mysql> select @@global.tx_isolation, @@tx_isolation;
+-----------------------+-----------------+
| @@global.tx_isolation | @@tx_isolation  |
+-----------------------+-----------------+
| REPEATABLE-READ       | REPEATABLE-READ |
+-----------------------+-----------------+

实验一:

t Session A                   Session B
|
| START TRANSACTION;          START TRANSACTION;
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| empty set
|                             INSERT INTO t_bitfly
|                             VALUES (1, 'a');
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| empty set
|                             COMMIT;
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| empty set
|
| INSERT INTO t_bitfly VALUES (1, 'a');
| ERROR 1062 (23000):
| Duplicate entry '1' for key 1
v (shit, 刚刚明明告诉我没有这条记录的)

如此就出现了幻读,觉得表里没有数据,其实数据已经存在了,傻乎乎的提交后,才发现数据冲突了。

实验二:

t Session A                  Session B
|
| START TRANSACTION;         START TRANSACTION;
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +------+-------+
| | id   | value |
| +------+-------+
| |    1 | a     |
| +------+-------+
|                            INSERT INTO t_bitfly
|                            VALUES (2, 'b');
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +------+-------+
| | id   | value |
| +------+-------+
| |    1 | a     |
| +------+-------+
|                            COMMIT;
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +------+-------+
| | id   | value |
| +------+-------+
| |    1 | a     |
| +------+-------+
|
| UPDATE t_bitfly SET value='z';
| Rows matched: 2  Changed: 2  Warnings: 0
| (怎么多出来一行)
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +------+-------+
| | id   | value |
| +------+-------+
| |    1 | z     |
| |    2 | z     |
| +------+-------+

本事务中第一次读取出一行,作了一次更新后,另外一个事务里提交的数据就出现了。也能够看作是一种幻读。
当隔离级别是可重复读,且禁用innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog的状况下,在搜索和扫描index的时候使用的next-key locks能够避免幻读。


再看一个实验,要注意,表t_bitfly里的id为主键字段。

实验三:
t Session A                 Session B
|
| START TRANSACTION;        START TRANSACTION;
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly
| WHERE id<=1
| FOR UPDATE;
| +------+-------+
| | id   | value |
| +------+-------+
| |    1 | a     |
| +------+-------+
|                           INSERT INTO t_bitfly
|                           VALUES (2, 'b');
|                           Query OK, 1 row affected
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +------+-------+
| | id   | value |
| +------+-------+
| |    1 | a     |
| +------+-------+
|                           INSERT INTO t_bitfly
|                           VALUES (0, '0');
|                           (waiting for lock ...then timeout)
|                           ERROR 1205 (HY000):
|                           Lock wait timeout exceeded;
|                           try restarting transaction
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +------+-------+
| | id   | value |
| +------+-------+
| |    1 | a     |
| +------+-------+
|                           COMMIT;
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;

| +------+-------+
| | id   | value |
| +------+-------+
| |    1 | a     |
| +------+-------+

能够看到,用id<=1加的锁,只锁住了id<=1的范围,能够成功添加id为2的记录,添加id为0的记录时就会等待锁的释放。

实验四:一致性读和提交读
t Session A                      Session B
|
| START TRANSACTION;             START TRANSACTION;
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +----+-------+
| | id | value |
| +----+-------+
| |  1 | a     |
| +----+-------+
|                                INSERT INTO t_bitfly
|                                VALUES (2, 'b');
|                                COMMIT;
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +----+-------+
| | id | value |
| +----+-------+
| |  1 | a     |
| +----+-------+
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly LOCK IN SHARE MODE;
| +----+-------+
| | id | value |
| +----+-------+
| |  1 | a     |
| |  2 | b     |
| +----+-------+
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly FOR UPDATE;
| +----+-------+
| | id | value |
| +----+-------+
| |  1 | a     |
| |  2 | b     |
| +----+-------+
|
| SELECT * FROM t_bitfly;
| +----+-------+
| | id | value |
| +----+-------+
| |  1 | a     |
| +----+-------+

若是使用普通的读,会获得一致性的结果,若是使用了加锁的读,就会读到“最新的”“提交”读的结果。

自己,可重复读和提交读是矛盾的。在同一个事务里,若是保证了可重复读,就会看不到其余事务的提交,违背了提交读;若是保证了提交读,就会致使先后两次读到的结果不一致,违背了可重复读。

能够这么讲,InnoDB提供了这样的机制,在默认的可重复读的隔离级别里,可使用加锁读去查询最新的数据(提交读)。
MySQL InnoDB的可重复读并不保证避免幻读,须要应用使用加锁读来保证。而这个加锁度使用到的机制就是next-key locks

相关文章
相关标签/搜索