Spring boot异步注解源码解析

时间 2019-11-06

原文原文链接

1、例子

咱们先来看下面这个Demo。java

pom.xml中maven依赖：web

<parent>
	<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
	<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
	<version>1.5.14.RELEASE</version>
	<relativePath/> <!-- lookup parent from repository -->
</parent>

<dependencies>
	<dependency>
		<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
		<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
	</dependency>

	<dependency>
		<groupId>org.projectlombok</groupId>
		<artifactId>lombok</artifactId>
		<version>1.16.18</version>
	</dependency>
	<dependency>
		<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
		<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
		<scope>test</scope>
	</dependency>
</dependencies>

启动类SpringBootAsyncApplication.javaspring

@SpringBootApplication
@EnableAsync
public class SpringBootAsyncApplication {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(SpringBootAsyncApplication.class, args);
    }

}

DemoController.javac#

@RestController
@RequestMapping(value = "/demos")
@Slf4j
public class DemoController {

    @Autowired
    private IDemoService demoService;

    @GetMapping("")
    public String test(@RequestParam String name) {
        long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
        log.info("start send. ThreadName: {}", Thread.currentThread().getName());
        demoService.send(name);
        long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
        log.info("send end, time: {}", (end - start));
        return "success";
    }

}

IDemoService接口实现类DemoServiceImpl.javasegmentfault

@Service
@Slf4j
public class DemoServiceImpl implements IDemoService {

    @Async
    @Override
    public void send(String name) {
        try {
            Thread.sleep(5000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        log.info("async name={}, ThreadName: {}", name, Thread.currentThread().getName());
    }

}

启动项目后，访问GET http://127.0.0.1:8002/demos?name=test，获得以下结果：app

2019-04-12 17:17:32.462 INFO 12 --- [nio-8002-exec-1] c.l.d.s.controller.DemoController        : start send. ThreadName: http-nio-8002-exec-1
2019-04-12 17:17:32.466 INFO 12 --- [nio-8002-exec-1] .s.a.AnnotationAsyncExecutionInterceptor : No task executor bean found for async processing: no bean of type TaskExecutor and no bean named 'taskExecutor' either
2019-04-12 17:17:32.467 INFO 12 --- [nio-8002-exec-1] c.l.d.s.controller.DemoController        : send end, time: 5
2019-04-12 17:17:37.468 INFO 12 --- [cTaskExecutor-1] c.l.d.s.service.impl.DemoServiceImpl     : async name=test, ThreadName: SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor-1

经过控制台日志打印，咱们能够看到有两个线程，一个是主线程，一个是异步的线程。没等异步的线程执行完，主线程就直接执行完毕，返回响应结果了，这就是异步的效果。less

2、结论

2.1 实现异步方式

开启异步配置，即在启动类或者配置类上加@EnableAsync注解；
在方法或类上加@Async注解。

2.2 @Async注解

用@Async注解的方法，将使它在一个单独的线程（例子中SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor-1线程）中执行，调用者不用等待被调用方法完成。
用@Async注解的方法，必须只应用于public方法上（只有public修饰的方法才能被进行代理）。
@Async注解不能自调用，即在同一个类中调用异步方法，不然不起做用（同一个类中调用方法的话会略过代理进行直接调用）。

3、疑问

为何会抛出下面这段日志？异步

[nio-8002-exec-1] .s.a.AnnotationAsyncExecutionInterceptor : No task executor bean found for async processing: no bean of type TaskExecutor and no bean named 'taskExecutor' either

没有发现用于异步处理的任务执行器，既没有TaskExecutor类型的bean，也没有名为“taskExecutor”的bean。什么意思？并且异步开启的线程为啥前缀是SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor？带着这些疑问，咱们深刻到源码中，看看到底发生了什么。async

4、源码解析

spring-context-4.3.18.RELEASE.jar!org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.Async.javamaven

/**
 * Annotation that marks a method as a candidate for <i>asynchronous</i> execution.
 * Can also be used at the type level, in which case all of the type's methods are
 * considered as asynchronous.
 *
 * <p>In terms of target method signatures, any parameter types are supported.
 * However, the return type is constrained to either {@code void} or
 * {@link java.util.concurrent.Future}. In the latter case, you may declare the
 * more specific {@link org.springframework.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture} or
 * {@link java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture} types which allow for richer
 * interaction with the asynchronous task and for immediate composition with
 * further processing steps.
 *
 * <p>A {@code Future} handle returned from the proxy will be an actual asynchronous
 * {@code Future} that can be used to track the result of the asynchronous method
 * execution. However, since the target method needs to implement the same signature,
 * it will have to return a temporary {@code Future} handle that just passes a value
 * through: e.g. Spring's {@link AsyncResult}, EJB 3.1's {@link javax.ejb.AsyncResult},
 * or {@link java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture#completedFuture(Object)}.
 *
 * @author Juergen Hoeller
 * @author Chris Beams
 * @since 3.0
 * @see AnnotationAsyncExecutionInterceptor
 * @see AsyncAnnotationAdvisor
 */
@Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
public @interface Async {

	/**
     * 指定异步操做的限定符值
	 * A qualifier value for the specified asynchronous operation(s).
	 * <p>May be used to determine the target executor to be used when executing this
	 * method, matching the qualifier value (or the bean name) of a specific
	 * {@link java.util.concurrent.Executor Executor} or
	 * {@link org.springframework.core.task.TaskExecutor TaskExecutor}
	 * bean definition.
	 * <p>When specified on a class level {@code @Async} annotation, indicates that the
	 * given executor should be used for all methods within the class. Method level use
	 * of {@code Async#value} always overrides any value set at the class level.
	 * @since 3.1.2
	 */
	String value() default "";

}

spring-context-4.3.18.RELEASE.jar!org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.EnableAsync.java

package org.springframework.scheduling.annotation;

import java.lang.annotation.Annotation;
import java.lang.annotation.Documented;
import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

import org.springframework.context.annotation.AdviceMode;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Import;
import org.springframework.core.Ordered;

/**
 * Enables Spring's asynchronous method execution capability, similar to functionality
 * found in Spring's {@code <task:*>} XML namespace.
 *
 * <p>To be used together with @{@link Configuration Configuration} classes as follows,
 * enabling annotation-driven async processing for an entire Spring application context:
 *
 * <pre class="code">
 * &#064;Configuration
 * &#064;EnableAsync
 * public class AppConfig {
 *
 * }</pre>
 *
 * {@code MyAsyncBean} is a user-defined type with one or more methods annotated with
 * either Spring's {@code @Async} annotation, the EJB 3.1 {@code @javax.ejb.Asynchronous}
 * annotation, or any custom annotation specified via the {@link #annotation} attribute.
 * The aspect is added transparently for any registered bean, for instance via this
 * configuration:
 *
 * <pre class="code">
 * &#064;Configuration
 * public class AnotherAppConfig {
 *
 *     &#064;Bean
 *     public MyAsyncBean asyncBean() {
 *         return new MyAsyncBean();
 *     }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>By default, Spring will be searching for an associated thread pool definition:
 * either a unique {@link org.springframework.core.task.TaskExecutor} bean in the context,
 * or an {@link java.util.concurrent.Executor} bean named "taskExecutor" otherwise. If
 * neither of the two is resolvable, a {@link org.springframework.core.task.SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor}
 * will be used to process async method invocations. Besides, annotated methods having a
 * {@code void} return type cannot transmit any exception back to the caller. By default,
 * such uncaught exceptions are only logged.
 *
 * <p>To customize all this, implement {@link AsyncConfigurer} and provide:
 * <ul>
 * <li>your own {@link java.util.concurrent.Executor Executor} through the
 * {@link AsyncConfigurer#getAsyncExecutor getAsyncExecutor()} method, and</li>
 * <li>your own {@link org.springframework.aop.interceptor.AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler
 * AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler} through the {@link AsyncConfigurer#getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler
 * getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler()}
 * method.</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <pre class="code">
 * &#064;Configuration
 * &#064;EnableAsync
 * public class AppConfig implements AsyncConfigurer {
 *
 *     &#064;Override
 *     public Executor getAsyncExecutor() {
 *         ThreadPoolTaskExecutor executor = new ThreadPoolTaskExecutor();
 *         executor.setCorePoolSize(7);
 *         executor.setMaxPoolSize(42);
 *         executor.setQueueCapacity(11);
 *         executor.setThreadNamePrefix("MyExecutor-");
 *         executor.initialize();
 *         return executor;
 *     }
 *
 *     &#064;Override
 *     public AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler() {
 *         return MyAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler();
 *     }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>If only one item needs to be customized, {@code null} can be returned to
 * keep the default settings. Consider also extending from {@link AsyncConfigurerSupport}
 * when possible.
 *
 * <p>Note: In the above example the {@code ThreadPoolTaskExecutor} is not a fully managed
 * Spring bean. Add the {@code @Bean} annotation to the {@code getAsyncExecutor()} method
 * if you want a fully managed bean. In such circumstances it is no longer necessary to
 * manually call the {@code executor.initialize()} method as this will be invoked
 * automatically when the bean is initialized.
 *
 * <p>For reference, the example above can be compared to the following Spring XML
 * configuration:
 *
 * <pre class="code">
 * {@code
 * <beans>
 *
 *     <task:annotation-driven executor="myExecutor" exception-handler="exceptionHandler"/>
 *
 *     <task:executor id="myExecutor" pool-size="7-42" queue-capacity="11"/>
 *
 *     <bean id="asyncBean" class="com.foo.MyAsyncBean"/>
 *
 *     <bean id="exceptionHandler" class="com.foo.MyAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler"/>
 *
 * </beans>
 * }</pre>
 *
 * The above XML-based and JavaConfig-based examples are equivalent except for the
 * setting of the <em>thread name prefix</em> of the {@code Executor}; this is because
 * the {@code <task:executor>} element does not expose such an attribute. This
 * demonstrates how the JavaConfig-based approach allows for maximum configurability
 * through direct access to actual componentry.
 *
 * <p>The {@link #mode} attribute controls how advice is applied: If the mode is
 * {@link AdviceMode#PROXY} (the default), then the other attributes control the behavior
 * of the proxying. Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through
 * the proxy only; local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way.
 *
 * <p>Note that if the {@linkplain #mode} is set to {@link AdviceMode#ASPECTJ}, then the
 * value of the {@link #proxyTargetClass} attribute will be ignored. Note also that in
 * this case the {@code spring-aspects} module JAR must be present on the classpath, with
 * compile-time weaving or load-time weaving applying the aspect to the affected classes.
 * There is no proxy involved in such a scenario; local calls will be intercepted as well.
 *
 * @author Chris Beams
 * @author Juergen Hoeller
 * @author Stephane Nicoll
 * @author Sam Brannen
 * @since 3.1
 * @see Async
 * @see AsyncConfigurer
 * @see AsyncConfigurationSelector
 */
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Import(AsyncConfigurationSelector.class)
public @interface EnableAsync {

	/**
	 * Indicate the 'async' annotation type to be detected at either class
	 * or method level.
	 * <p>By default, both Spring's @{@link Async} annotation and the EJB 3.1
	 * {@code @javax.ejb.Asynchronous} annotation will be detected.
	 * <p>This attribute exists so that developers can provide their own
	 * custom annotation type to indicate that a method (or all methods of
	 * a given class) should be invoked asynchronously.
	 */
	Class<? extends Annotation> annotation() default Annotation.class;

	/**
	 * Indicate whether subclass-based (CGLIB) proxies are to be created as opposed
	 * to standard Java interface-based proxies.
	 * <p><strong>Applicable only if the {@link #mode} is set to {@link AdviceMode#PROXY}</strong>.
	 * <p>The default is {@code false}.
	 * <p>Note that setting this attribute to {@code true} will affect <em>all</em>
	 * Spring-managed beans requiring proxying, not just those marked with {@code @Async}.
	 * For example, other beans marked with Spring's {@code @Transactional} annotation
	 * will be upgraded to subclass proxying at the same time. This approach has no
	 * negative impact in practice unless one is explicitly expecting one type of proxy
	 * vs. another &mdash; for example, in tests.
	 */
	boolean proxyTargetClass() default false;

	/**
	 * Indicate how async advice should be applied.
	 * <p><b>The default is {@link AdviceMode#PROXY}.</b>
	 * Please note that proxy mode allows for interception of calls through the proxy
	 * only. Local calls within the same class cannot get intercepted that way; an
	 * {@link Async} annotation on such a method within a local call will be ignored
	 * since Spring's interceptor does not even kick in for such a runtime scenario.
	 * For a more advanced mode of interception, consider switching this to
	 * {@link AdviceMode#ASPECTJ}.
	 */
	AdviceMode mode() default AdviceMode.PROXY;

	/**
	 * Indicate the order in which the {@link AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor}
	 * should be applied.
	 * <p>The default is {@link Ordered#LOWEST_PRECEDENCE} in order to run
	 * after all other post-processors, so that it can add an advisor to
	 * existing proxies rather than double-proxy.
	 */
	int order() default Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE;

}

@EnableAsync启用Spring异步方法执行功能，相似于Spring的<task:*>XML命名空间，和@Configuration注解类一块儿使用，为整个Spring应用程序上下文启用注释驱动的异步处理。

默认状况下，Spring将会搜索一个关联的线程池定义：要么是一个在上下文中惟一的TaskExecutor类型的bean，要么是一个名叫"taskExecutor"的Executor类型的bean；若是二者都没法解决，SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor将用于处理异步方法调用。此外，具备void返回类型的带注释的方法不能将任何异常传回调用者。默认状况下，此类未捕获异常只会被记录下来。

为了定制全部这些，须要实现AsyncConfigurer类，并重写AsyncConfigurer类中getAsyncExecutor()方法和getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler()方法。

@Configuration
@EnableAsync
public class AppConfig implements AsyncConfigurer {

    @Override
    public Executor getAsyncExecutor() {
        ThreadPoolTaskExecutor executor= new ThreadPoolTaskExecutor();
        executor.setCorePoolSize(7);
        executor.setMaxPoolSize(42);
        executor.setQueueCapacity(11);
        executor.setThreadNamePrefix("MyExecutor-");
        executor.initialize();
        return executor;
    }

    @Override
    public AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler() {
        return MyAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler();
    }

}

若是只须要定制一个项目，则能够返回null以保持默认设置，若是可能的话还能够考虑从AsyncConfigurerSupport扩展。

注意：在上面的示例中，ThreadPoolTaskExecutor不是一个彻底受管理Spring bean。若是你想要一个彻底受管理的bean，能够将@Bean注解添加到getAsyncExecutor()方法上；在这种状况下，就没有必要再手动调用executor.initialize()方法进行bean初始化了。

@Bean
@Override
public Executor getAsyncExecutor() {
	ThreadPoolTaskExecutor executor= new ThreadPoolTaskExecutor();
	executor.setCorePoolSize(7);
	executor.setMaxPoolSize(42);
	executor.setQueueCapacity(11);
	executor.setThreadNamePrefix("MyExecutor-");
	return executor;
}

为了便于参考，能够将上面的示例与下面的Spring XML配置进行比较：

<beans>
	<task:annotation-driven executor="myExecutor" exception-handler="exceptionHandler"/>

	<task:executor id="myExecutor" pool-size="7-42" queue-capacity="11"/>
 
	<bean id="asyncBean" class="com.foo.MyAsyncBean"/>
	
	<bean id="exceptionHandler" class="com.foo.MyAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler"/>
</beans>

上述基于xml和基于Java配置的示例除了设置执行器的线程名前缀外，其他都是等价的，这是由于<task:executor>元素没有暴露这样的属性。这演示了基于Java配置的方法如何经过直接访问实际组件来实现最大的可配置性。

#mode属性控制应用如何被通知：若是mode是AdviceMode#PROXY（默认值），那么其余属性控制代理的行为。请注意，代理模式只容许拦截经过代理进行的调用，同一类内的本地调用不能以这种方式被拦截。

注意，若是#mode被设置为AdviceMode#ASPECTJ，那么#proxyTargetClass属性值将被忽略。还要注意，在这种状况下，spring-aspects模块JAR必须出如今类路径上，编译时或加载时应用切面到受影响的类上。在这种状况下不涉及代理，本地调用也会被拦截。

上面这些都是EnableAsync类注释，具体是如何实现的？且看下面。

有没有发现，EnableAsync类惟一的核心注解就是@Import(AsyncConfigurationSelector.class)，咱们来看下它的源码：

spring-context-4.3.18.RELEASE.jar!org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.AsyncConfigurationSelector.java

/**
 * Selects which implementation of {@link AbstractAsyncConfiguration} should be used based
 * on the value of {@link EnableAsync#mode} on the importing {@code @Configuration} class.
 *
 * @author Chris Beams
 * @since 3.1
 * @see EnableAsync
 * @see ProxyAsyncConfiguration
 */
public class AsyncConfigurationSelector extends AdviceModeImportSelector<EnableAsync> {

	private static final String ASYNC_EXECUTION_ASPECT_CONFIGURATION_CLASS_NAME =
			"org.springframework.scheduling.aspectj.AspectJAsyncConfiguration";

	/**
	 * {@inheritDoc}
	 * @return {@link ProxyAsyncConfiguration} or {@code AspectJAsyncConfiguration} for
	 * {@code PROXY} and {@code ASPECTJ} values of {@link EnableAsync#mode()}, respectively
	 */
	@Override
	public String[] selectImports(AdviceMode adviceMode) {
		switch (adviceMode) {
			case PROXY:
				return new String[] { ProxyAsyncConfiguration.class.getName() };
			case ASPECTJ:
				return new String[] { ASYNC_EXECUTION_ASPECT_CONFIGURATION_CLASS_NAME };
			default:
				return null;
		}
	}

}

根据导入@Configuration类上EnableAsync#mode的值选择AbstractAsyncConfiguration的哪一个实现类应该被使用。

默认配置PROXY，使用ProxyAsyncConfiguration。

spring-context-4.3.18.RELEASE.jar!org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.ProxyAsyncConfiguration.java

/**
 * {@code @Configuration} class that registers the Spring infrastructure beans necessary
 * to enable proxy-based asynchronous method execution.
 *
 * @author Chris Beams
 * @author Stephane Nicoll
 * @since 3.1
 * @see EnableAsync
 * @see AsyncConfigurationSelector
 */
@Configuration
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public class ProxyAsyncConfiguration extends AbstractAsyncConfiguration {

    /**
     * 定义了一个AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor类bean
     */
	@Bean(name = TaskManagementConfigUtils.ASYNC_ANNOTATION_PROCESSOR_BEAN_NAME)
	@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
	public AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor asyncAdvisor() {
		Assert.notNull(this.enableAsync, "@EnableAsync annotation metadata was not injected");
        // 新建一个异步注解bean后处理器
		AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor bpp = new AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor();
        // 获取@EnableAsync中用户自定义annotation
		Class<? extends Annotation> customAsyncAnnotation = this.enableAsync.getClass("annotation");
        // 若是不是默认注解，则设置异步注解配置
		if (customAsyncAnnotation != AnnotationUtils.getDefaultValue(EnableAsync.class, "annotation")) {
			bpp.setAsyncAnnotationType(customAsyncAnnotation);
		}
        // 设置线程任务执行器
		if (this.executor != null) {
			bpp.setExecutor(this.executor);
		}
        // 设置异常处理器
		if (this.exceptionHandler != null) {
			bpp.setExceptionHandler(this.exceptionHandler);
		}
        // 设置是否升级到CGLIB子类代理，默认不开启
		bpp.setProxyTargetClass(this.enableAsync.getBoolean("proxyTargetClass"));
        // 设置执行优先级，默认最后执行
		bpp.setOrder(this.enableAsync.<Integer>getNumber("order"));
		return bpp;
	}

}

spring-context-4.3.18.RELEASE.jar!org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.AbstractAsyncConfiguration.java

/**
 * Abstract base {@code Configuration} class providing common structure for enabling
 * Spring's asynchronous method execution capability.
 *
 * @author Chris Beams
 * @author Stephane Nicoll
 * @since 3.1
 * @see EnableAsync
 */
@Configuration
public abstract class AbstractAsyncConfiguration implements ImportAware {
    // 注解属性
	protected AnnotationAttributes enableAsync;
    // 线程任务执行器
	protected Executor executor;
    // 异常处理器
	protected AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler exceptionHandler;


	@Override
	public void setImportMetadata(AnnotationMetadata importMetadata) {
		this.enableAsync = AnnotationAttributes.fromMap(
				importMetadata.getAnnotationAttributes(EnableAsync.class.getName(), false));
		if (this.enableAsync == null) {
			throw new IllegalArgumentException(
					"@EnableAsync is not present on importing class " + importMetadata.getClassName());
		}
	}

	/**
	 * Collect any {@link AsyncConfigurer} beans through autowiring.
	 */
	@Autowired(required = false)
	void setConfigurers(Collection<AsyncConfigurer> configurers) {
		if (CollectionUtils.isEmpty(configurers)) {
			return;
		}
		if (configurers.size() > 1) {
			throw new IllegalStateException("Only one AsyncConfigurer may exist");
		}
		AsyncConfigurer configurer = configurers.iterator().next();
		this.executor = configurer.getAsyncExecutor();
		this.exceptionHandler = configurer.getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler();
	}

}

能够看到接口org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.AsyncConfigurer的惟一实现类org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.AsyncConfigurerSupport：

/**
 * A convenience {@link AsyncConfigurer} that implements all methods
 * so that the defaults are used. Provides a backward compatible alternative
 * of implementing {@link AsyncConfigurer} directly.
 *
 * @author Stephane Nicoll
 * @since 4.1
 */
public class AsyncConfigurerSupport implements AsyncConfigurer {

	@Override
	public Executor getAsyncExecutor() {
		return null;
	}

	@Override
	public AsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler getAsyncUncaughtExceptionHandler() {
		return null;
	}

}

这就是上面注释讲的，能够经过实现AsyncConfigurer接口实现默认线程池和异常处理的定制化。

回到ProxyAsyncConfiguration类，这是一个Configuration类，在其中经过@bean注入了AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor 类。

AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor这个类的Bean初始化时，重写了BeanFactoryAware接口setBeanFactory方法，对AsyncAnnotationAdvisor异步注解切面进行了构造。

@Override
public void setBeanFactory(BeanFactory beanFactory) {
	super.setBeanFactory(beanFactory);

	AsyncAnnotationAdvisor advisor = new AsyncAnnotationAdvisor(this.executor, this.exceptionHandler);
	if (this.asyncAnnotationType != null) {
		advisor.setAsyncAnnotationType(this.asyncAnnotationType);
	}
	advisor.setBeanFactory(beanFactory);
	this.advisor = advisor;
}

它会在普通bean属性以后、初始化回调（如InitializingBean#afterPropertiesSet() 或者一个自定义初始化方法）以前被调用。

AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor的后置bean处理是经过其父类AbstractAdvisingBeanPostProcessor来实现的，该类实现了BeanPostProcessor接口,重写postProcessAfterInitialization方法。

@Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) {
	if (bean instanceof AopInfrastructureBean) {
		// Ignore AOP infrastructure such as scoped proxies.
		return bean;
	}

    //把Advisor添加进bean  ProxyFactory-》AdvisedSupport-》Advised
	if (bean instanceof Advised) {
		Advised advised = (Advised) bean;
		if (!advised.isFrozen() && isEligible(AopUtils.getTargetClass(bean))) {
			// Add our local Advisor to the existing proxy's Advisor chain...
			if (this.beforeExistingAdvisors) {
				advised.addAdvisor(0, this.advisor);
			}
			else {
				advised.addAdvisor(this.advisor);
			}
			return bean;
		}
	}
   
    //构造ProxyFactory代理工厂，添加代理的接口，设置切面，最后返回代理类：AopProxy
	if (isEligible(bean, beanName)) {
		ProxyFactory proxyFactory = prepareProxyFactory(bean, beanName);
		if (!proxyFactory.isProxyTargetClass()) {
			evaluateProxyInterfaces(bean.getClass(), proxyFactory);
		}
		proxyFactory.addAdvisor(this.advisor);
		customizeProxyFactory(proxyFactory);
		return proxyFactory.getProxy(getProxyClassLoader());
	}

	// No async proxy needed.
	return bean;
}

JDK动态代理类JdkDynamicAopProxy实现AopProxy接口，最终执行的是InvocationHandler接口的invoke方法。

/**
 * Implementation of {@code InvocationHandler.invoke}.
 * <p>Callers will see exactly the exception thrown by the target,
 * unless a hook method throws an exception.
 */
@Override
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
	MethodInvocation invocation;
	Object oldProxy = null;
	boolean setProxyContext = false;

	TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource;
	Class<?> targetClass = null;
	Object target = null;

	try {
		if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) {
			// The target does not implement the equals(Object) method itself.
			return equals(args[0]);
		}
		else if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) {
			// The target does not implement the hashCode() method itself.
			return hashCode();
		}
		else if (method.getDeclaringClass() == DecoratingProxy.class) {
			// There is only getDecoratedClass() declared -> dispatch to proxy config.
			return AopProxyUtils.ultimateTargetClass(this.advised);
		}
		else if (!this.advised.opaque && method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() &&
				method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) {
			// Service invocations on ProxyConfig with the proxy config...
			return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised, method, args);
		}

		Object retVal;

		if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
			// Make invocation available if necessary.
			oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
			setProxyContext = true;
		}

		// May be null. Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target,
		// in case it comes from a pool.
		target = targetSource.getTarget();
		if (target != null) {
			targetClass = target.getClass();
		}

		// Get the interception chain for this method.
		List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);

		// Check whether we have any advice. If we don't, we can fallback on direct
		// reflective invocation of the target, and avoid creating a MethodInvocation.
		if (chain.isEmpty()) {
			// We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly
			// Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor so we know it does
			// nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot swapping or fancy proxying.
			Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args);
			retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, argsToUse);
		}
		else {
			// We need to create a method invocation...
			invocation = new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain);
			// Proceed to the joinpoint through the interceptor chain.
			retVal = invocation.proceed();
		}

		// Massage return value if necessary.
		Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
		if (retVal != null && retVal == target &&
				returnType != Object.class && returnType.isInstance(proxy) &&
				!RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) {
			// Special case: it returned "this" and the return type of the method
			// is type-compatible. Note that we can't help if the target sets
			// a reference to itself in another returned object.
			retVal = proxy;
		}
		else if (retVal == null && returnType != Void.TYPE && returnType.isPrimitive()) {
			throw new AopInvocationException(
					"Null return value from advice does not match primitive return type for: " + method);
		}
		return retVal;
	}
	finally {
		if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) {
			// Must have come from TargetSource.
			targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
		}
		if (setProxyContext) {
			// Restore old proxy.
			AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
		}
	}
}

@Async注解的拦截器是AsyncExecutionInterceptor，它继承了MethodInterceptor接口。而MethodInterceptor就是AOP规范中的Advice（切点的处理器）。chain不为空，执行第二个分支，构造ReflectiveMethodInvocation，而后执行proceed方法。

@Override
public Object proceed() throws Throwable {
	//	We start with an index of -1 and increment early.
	if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) {
		return invokeJoinpoint();
	}

	Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice =
			this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex);
	if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) {
		// Evaluate dynamic method matcher here: static part will already have
		// been evaluated and found to match.
		InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm =
				(InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice;
		if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method, this.targetClass, this.arguments)) {
			return dm.interceptor.invoke(this);
		}
		else {
			// Dynamic matching failed.
			// Skip this interceptor and invoke the next in the chain.
			return proceed();
		}
	}
	else {
		// It's an interceptor, so we just invoke it: The pointcut will have
		// been evaluated statically before this object was constructed.
		return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this);
	}
}

核心方法是InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher.interceptor.invoke(this)，实际就是执行了AsyncExecutionInterceptor.invoke。

/**
 * Intercept the given method invocation, submit the actual calling of the method to
 * the correct task executor and return immediately to the caller.
 * @param invocation the method to intercept and make asynchronous
 * @return {@link Future} if the original method returns {@code Future}; {@code null}
 * otherwise.
 */
@Override
public Object invoke(final MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
	Class<?> targetClass = (invocation.getThis() != null ? AopUtils.getTargetClass(invocation.getThis()) : null);
	Method specificMethod = ClassUtils.getMostSpecificMethod(invocation.getMethod(), targetClass);
	final Method userDeclaredMethod = BridgeMethodResolver.findBridgedMethod(specificMethod);

	AsyncTaskExecutor executor = determineAsyncExecutor(userDeclaredMethod);
	if (executor == null) {
		throw new IllegalStateException(
				"No executor specified and no default executor set on AsyncExecutionInterceptor either");
	}

	Callable<Object> task = new Callable<Object>() {
		@Override
		public Object call() throws Exception {
			try {
				Object result = invocation.proceed();
				if (result instanceof Future) {
					return ((Future<?>) result).get();
				}
			}
			catch (ExecutionException ex) {
				handleError(ex.getCause(), userDeclaredMethod, invocation.getArguments());
			}
			catch (Throwable ex) {
				handleError(ex, userDeclaredMethod, invocation.getArguments());
			}
			return null;
		}
	};

	return doSubmit(task, executor, invocation.getMethod().getReturnType());
}

spring-aop-4.3.18.RELEASE-sources.jar!/org/springframework/aop/interceptor/AsyncExecutionAspectSupport.java

/**
 * Determine the specific executor to use when executing the given method.
 * Should preferably return an {@link AsyncListenableTaskExecutor} implementation.
 * @return the executor to use (or {@code null}, but just if no default executor is available)
 */
protected AsyncTaskExecutor determineAsyncExecutor(Method method) {
	AsyncTaskExecutor executor = this.executors.get(method);
	if (executor == null) {
		Executor targetExecutor;
		String qualifier = getExecutorQualifier(method);
		if (StringUtils.hasLength(qualifier)) {
			targetExecutor = findQualifiedExecutor(this.beanFactory, qualifier);
		}
		else {
			targetExecutor = this.defaultExecutor;
			if (targetExecutor == null) {
				synchronized (this.executors) {
					if (this.defaultExecutor == null) {
						this.defaultExecutor = getDefaultExecutor(this.beanFactory);
					}
					targetExecutor = this.defaultExecutor;
				}
			}
		}
		if (targetExecutor == null) {
			return null;
		}
		executor = (targetExecutor instanceof AsyncListenableTaskExecutor ?
				(AsyncListenableTaskExecutor) targetExecutor : new TaskExecutorAdapter(targetExecutor));
		this.executors.put(method, executor);
	}
	return executor;
}

@Aync注解有个value能够标注使用哪一个executor，这里的getExecutorQualifier就是寻找这个标识。这里若是defaultExecutor为null的话，则获取找默认的executor。

/**
 * Retrieve or build a default executor for this advice instance.
 * An executor returned from here will be cached for further use.
 * <p>The default implementation searches for a unique {@link TaskExecutor} bean
 * in the context, or for an {@link Executor} bean named "taskExecutor" otherwise.
 * If neither of the two is resolvable, this implementation will return {@code null}.
 * @param beanFactory the BeanFactory to use for a default executor lookup
 * @return the default executor, or {@code null} if none available
 * @since 4.2.6
 * @see #findQualifiedExecutor(BeanFactory, String)
 * @see #DEFAULT_TASK_EXECUTOR_BEAN_NAME
 */
protected Executor getDefaultExecutor(BeanFactory beanFactory) {
	if (beanFactory != null) {
		try {
			// Search for TaskExecutor bean... not plain Executor since that would
			// match with ScheduledExecutorService as well, which is unusable for
			// our purposes here. TaskExecutor is more clearly designed for it.
			return beanFactory.getBean(TaskExecutor.class);
		}
		catch (NoUniqueBeanDefinitionException ex) {
			logger.debug("Could not find unique TaskExecutor bean", ex);
			try {
				return beanFactory.getBean(DEFAULT_TASK_EXECUTOR_BEAN_NAME, Executor.class);
			}
			catch (NoSuchBeanDefinitionException ex2) {
				if (logger.isInfoEnabled()) {
					logger.info("More than one TaskExecutor bean found within the context, and none is named " +
							"'taskExecutor'. Mark one of them as primary or name it 'taskExecutor' (possibly " +
							"as an alias) in order to use it for async processing: " + ex.getBeanNamesFound());
				}
			}
		}
		catch (NoSuchBeanDefinitionException ex) {
			logger.debug("Could not find default TaskExecutor bean", ex);
			try {
				return beanFactory.getBean(DEFAULT_TASK_EXECUTOR_BEAN_NAME, Executor.class);
			}
			catch (NoSuchBeanDefinitionException ex2) {
				logger.info("No task executor bean found for async processing: " +
						"no bean of type TaskExecutor and no bean named 'taskExecutor' either");
			}
			// Giving up -> either using local default executor or none at all...
		}
	}
	return null;
}

若是工程里头没有定义默认的task executor的话，则获取bean的时候会抛出NoSuchBeanDefinitionException。这就是为何上面例子中会抛出以下错误的缘由。

[nio-8002-exec-1] .s.a.AnnotationAsyncExecutionInterceptor : No task executor bean found for async processing: no bean of type TaskExecutor and no bean named 'taskExecutor' either

spring-aop-4.3.18.RELEASE-sources.jar!/org/springframework/aop/interceptor/AsyncExecutionInterceptor.java

/**
 * This implementation searches for a unique {@link org.springframework.core.task.TaskExecutor}
 * bean in the context, or for an {@link Executor} bean named "taskExecutor" otherwise.
 * If neither of the two is resolvable (e.g. if no {@code BeanFactory} was configured at all),
 * this implementation falls back to a newly created {@link SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor} instance
 * for local use if no default could be found.
 * @see #DEFAULT_TASK_EXECUTOR_BEAN_NAME
 */
@Override
protected Executor getDefaultExecutor(BeanFactory beanFactory) {
	Executor defaultExecutor = super.getDefaultExecutor(beanFactory);
	return (defaultExecutor != null ? defaultExecutor : new SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor());
}

AsyncExecutionInterceptor重写了getDefaultExecutor方法，先调用AsyncExecutionAspectSupport的getDefaultExecutor，若是默认的找不到，这里new一个SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor。这也是为何上面例子中出现SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor线程前缀的缘由。

5、总结

总体流程大致可梳理为两条线：

1.从注解开始：@EnableAsync--》ProxyAsyncConfiguration类构造一个bean（类型：AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor）

2.从AsyncAnnotationBeanPostProcessor这个类的bean的生命周期走：AOP-Advisor切面初始化（setBeanFactory()）--》AOP-生成代理类AopProxy（postProcessAfterInitialization()）--》AOP-切点执行（InvocationHandler.invoke）

参考

https://segmentfault.com/a/1190000011339882

https://blog.csdn.net/qq_39470742/article/details/83382338

https://blog.csdn.net/fenglongmiao/article/details/82429460

https://www.baeldung.com/spring-async