PIPE(7) Linux Programmer’s Manual PIPE(7) NAME pipe - overview of pipes and FIFOs DESCRIPTION Pipes and FIFOs (also known as named pipes) provide a unidirectional interprocess communication channel. A pipe has a read end and a write end. Data written to the write end of a pipe can be read from the read end of the pipe. A pipe is created using pipe(2), which creates a new pipe and returns two file descriptors, one referring to the read end of the pipe, the other referring to the write end. Pipes can be used to create a communication channel between related processes; see pipe(2) for an example. A FIFO (short for First In First Out) has a name within the file system (created using mkfifo(3)), and is opened using open(2). Any process may open a FIFO, assuming the file permissions allow it. The read end is opened using the O_RDONLY flag; the write end is opened using the O_WRONLY flag. See fifo(7) for further details. Note: although FIFOs have a pathname in the file system, I/O on FIFOs does not involve operations on the underlying device (if there is one). I/O on Pipes and FIFOs The only difference between pipes and FIFOs is the manner in which they are created and opened. Once these tasks have been accomplished, I/O on pipes and FIFOs has exactly the same semantics. If a process attempts to read from an empty pipe, then read(2) will block until data is available. If a process attempts to write to a full pipe (see below), then write(2) blocks until sufficient data has been read from the pipe to allow the write to complete. Non-blocking I/O is possible by using the fcntl(2) F_SETFL oper- ation to enable the O_NONBLOCK open file status flag. The communication channel provided by a pipe is a byte stream: there is no concept of message boundaries. If all file descriptors referring to the write end of a pipe have been closed, then an attempt to read(2) from the pipe will see end-of-file (read(2) will return 0). If all file descriptors referring to the read end of a pipe have been closed, then a write(2) will cause a SIGPIPE signal to be generated for the calling pro- cess. If the calling process is ignoring this signal, then write(2) fails with the error EPIPE. An application that uses pipe(2) and fork(2) should use suitable close(2) calls to close unnecessary duplicate file descriptors; this ensures that end-of-file and SIGPIPE/EPIPE are delivered when appropriate. It is not possible to apply lseek(2) to a pipe. Pipe Capacity A pipe has a limited capacity. If the pipe is full, then a write(2) will block or fail, depending on whether the O_NONBLOCK flag is set (see below). Different implementations have different limits for the pipe capacity. Applications should not rely on a particular capacity: an application should be designed so that a reading process consumes data as soon as it is available, so that a writing process does not remain blocked. In Linux versions before 2.6.11, the capacity of a pipe was the same as the system page size (e.g., 4096 bytes on i386). Since Linux 2.6.11, the pipe capacity is 65536 bytes. PIPE_BUF POSIX.1-2001 says that write(2)s of less than PIPE_BUF bytes must be atomic: the output data is written to the pipe as a contiguous sequence. Writes of more than PIPE_BUF bytes may be non-atomic: the kernel may interleave the data with data written by other processes. POSIX.1-2001 requires PIPE_BUF to be at least 512 bytes. (On Linux, PIPE_BUF is 4096 bytes.) The precise semantics depend on whether the file descriptor is non-blocking (O_NONBLOCK), whether there are multiple writers to the pipe, and on n, the number of bytes to be written: O_NONBLOCK disabled, n <= PIPE_BUF All n bytes are written atomically; write(2) may block if there is not room for n bytes to be written immediately O_NONBLOCK enabled, n <= PIPE_BUF If there is room to write n bytes to the pipe, then write(2) succeeds immediately, writing all n bytes; otherwise write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. O_NONBLOCK disabled, n > PIPE_BUF The write is non-atomic: the data given to write(2) may be interleaved with write(2)s by other process; the write(2) blocks until n bytes have been written. O_NONBLOCK enabled, n > PIPE_BUF If the pipe is full, then write(2) fails, with errno set to EAGAIN. Otherwise, from 1 to n bytes may be written (i.e., a "partial write" may occur; the caller should check the return value from write(2) to see how many bytes were actually written), and these bytes may be interleaved with writes by other processes. Open File Status Flags The only open file status flags that can be meaningfully applied to a pipe or FIFO are O_NONBLOCK and O_ASYNC. Setting the O_ASYNC flag for the read end of a pipe causes a signal (SIGIO by default) to be generated when new input becomes available on the pipe (see fcntl(2) for details). On Linux, O_ASYNC is supported for pipes and FIFOs only since kernel 2.6. Portability notes On some systems (but not Linux), pipes are bidirectional: data can be transmitted in both directions between the pipe ends. According to POSIX.1-2001, pipes only need to be unidirectional. Portable applications should avoid reliance on bidirectional pipe semantics.
当没有数据可读时linux
当管道满的时候app
若是全部管道写端对应的文件描述符被关闭,则read返回0less
若是全部管道读端对应的文件描述符被关闭,则write操做会产生信号SIGPIPEide
当要写入的数据量不大于PIPE_BUF时,linux将保证写入的原子性。ui
当要写入的数据量大于PIPE_BUF时,linux将再也不保证写入的原子性。this
#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <fcntl.h> int main(void) { int fds[2]; if(pipe(fds) == -1){ perror("pipe error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("begin test pipe\n"); pid_t pid; pid = fork(); if(pid == -1){ perror("fork error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if(pid == 0){ close(fds[0]);//子进程关闭读端 sleep(10); write(fds[1],"hello",5); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } close(fds[1]);//父进程关闭写端 char buf[10] = {0}; read(fds[0],buf,10); printf("receive datas = %s\n",buf); return 0; }
运行结果:atom
说明:管道建立时默认打开了文件描述符,且默认是阻塞(block)模式打开spa
因此这里,咱们让子进程先睡眠10s,父进程由于没有数据从管道中读出,被阻塞了,直到子进程睡眠结束,向管道中写入数据后,父进程才读到数据code
#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <fcntl.h> int main(void) { int fds[2]; if(pipe(fds) == -1){ perror("pipe error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("begin test pipe\n"); pid_t pid; pid = fork(); if(pid == -1){ perror("fork error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if(pid == 0){ close(fds[0]);//子进程关闭读端 sleep(10); write(fds[1],"hello",5); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } close(fds[1]);//父进程关闭写端 char buf[10] = {0}; int flags = fcntl(fds[0], F_GETFL);//先获取原先的flags fcntl(fds[0],F_SETFL,flags | O_NONBLOCK);//设置fd为非阻塞模式 int ret; ret = read(fds[0],buf,10); if(ret == -1){ perror("read error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("receive datas = %s\n",buf); return 0; }
运行结果:进程
#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <fcntl.h> int main(void) { int fds[2]; if(pipe(fds) == -1){ perror("pipe error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("begin test pipe\n"); pid_t pid; pid = fork(); if(pid == -1){ perror("fork error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if(pid == 0){ close(fds[1]);//子进程关闭写端 exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } close(fds[1]);//父进程关闭写端 char buf[10] = {0}; int ret; ret = read(fds[0],buf,10); printf("ret = %d\n", ret); return 0; }
运行结果:
可知确实返回0,表示读到了文件末尾,并不表示出错
#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <signal.h> void sighandler(int signo); int main(void) { int fds[2]; if(signal(SIGPIPE,sighandler) == SIG_ERR) { perror("signal error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } printf("begin test pipe\n"); if(pipe(fds) == -1){ perror("pipe error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } pid_t pid; pid = fork(); if(pid == -1){ perror("fork error"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } if(pid == 0){ close(fds[0]);//子进程关闭读端 exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } close(fds[0]);//父进程关闭读端 sleep(1);//确保子进程也将读端关闭 int ret; ret = write(fds[1],"hello",5); if(ret == -1){ printf("write error\n"); } return 0; } void sighandler(int signo) { printf("catch a SIGPIPE signal and signum = %d\n",signo); }
运行结果:
可知当全部读端都关闭时,write时确实产生SIGPIPE信号